I’m building an AI humanizer that also verifies the rewrite
Most AI rewriting tools stop once the text sounds smoother.
The part that kept bothering me was what might have changed along the way. A rewrite can sound more natural while quietly changing the original tone, meaning, facts, or citations.
That’s the problem I’m trying to solve with ProofWrite.
It helps users rewrite AI-generated drafts into clearer, more natural writing, then review and verify the revised result in the same workflow. It includes multiple writing modes, original-versus-revised comparison, and built-in quality checks.
I’m still improving the product, so I’d genuinely like to know:
When you review an AI rewrite, what matters most to you?
• Preserving the original meaning
• Keeping your personal tone
• Making the writing sound less generic
• Verifying facts and citations
• Clearly seeing what was changed
You can try it here: https://proofwrite.ai/
Honest feedback is welcome, especially from people who regularly edit AI-assisted writing.
Replies