Does Ember really feel like a second brain?

Before building ember.do, I spoke with 100 founders.

I didn’t want to start from my own assumptions.

I wanted to understand where founders actually lose time, where they lack context, where decisions become difficult, and which mistakes keep repeating.

That became the starting point for Ember.

Now that the product is live, I want to keep the same approach: listen, observe, improve.

So I’m looking for founders and their teams who are willing to test one part in particular:

Ember’s Second Brain.

The idea is simple: Ember should understand your company context, remember what matters, connect the dots, challenge your thinking, and help you make better decisions over time.

Not just answer isolated prompts.

I built Ember for entrepreneurs and their teams, so I’d really like to test it with the people it was made for.

What I’d love from testers:

• use it with real business questions

• push it on strategy, growth, sales, fundraising, finance, hiring, or product

• tell me where it feels genuinely useful

• tell me where it misses context

• tell me what you expected it to understand but didn’t

• challenge it

I’m especially interested in one question:

Does it actually feel like a second brain, or just another AI assistant?

If you’re a founder, operator, or part of an entrepreneurial team, I’d love for you to try it.

I built it for you :)

Ember is freemium, and I’m genuinely looking for feedback.