Pharmatext - AI fact-checking for pharma content that must survive MLR

by•
Pharma content dies in MLR review. PharmaText verifies every claim against your source PDFs, anchors citations to the exact passage, and flags contradictions — so your drafts are audit-ready before reviewers see them.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
šŸ“Œ
Hi Product Hunt! šŸ‘‹ I built PharmaText after seeing how much time pharma teams burn on MLR (Medical, Legal, Regulatory) review. A single deck can cycle through review 3–4 times, and most rejections come down to the same thing: claims that don't match their references, citations pointing to a 40-page PDF with no idea which passage supports what, or numbers that quietly contradict the source. PharmaText fixes that before reviewers ever see the draft: šŸ” It checks every claim against your actual source PDFs — not the open web šŸ“Œ It anchors each citation to the exact supporting passage, so reviewers can verify in one click āš ļø It flags contradictions and unsupported claims so writers fix them upfront The goal isn't to replace MLR review — it's to make sure content shows up audit-ready, so review becomes a confirmation step instead of a rework loop. If you've ever waited weeks for a deck to clear review (or been the reviewer chasing page numbers), I'd love your feedback. Happy to answer anything!