Where does your repo drift most: local, CI, containers, or remote?
by•
If you've been following along and would like to support us we would appreciate a star of GitHub: https://github.com/ota-run/ota
A repo can look fine until it is run in a different environment. Native setup, Docker, CI, and remote execution often carry different assumptions, and most teams only discover the mismatch when something breaks.
Ota makes those execution paths explicit so a repo can declare how it should be prepared, verified, and run in each environment.
Where does drift cost your team the most today: local setup, CI, containers, or remote environments?
That version is a bit better because it asks about pain, not just category.
4 views
Replies
Ota
I'll get things started: in my experience, the sneakiest drift happens between local and CI because both feel like they're running the same thing, right up until they're not. Local passes, CI fails, and the next hour disappears into environment archaeology. Which gap has cost you the most time?