Community feedback is shaping the next OSINTPRO risk graph work

Small OSINTPRO update: we got useful feedback from the OSINT community today around passive enrichment and confidence labels.

The strongest point was this: a tool should not just say "this domain has X". It should explain what is confirmed evidence, what is passive enrichment, and what is only an inferred risk path.

That is now a public roadmap item on GitHub:

https://github.com/haizen1312/osintpro/issues/7

The direction I want to test next is simple: keep the product passive-only, but make the graph more honest about how evidence connects to business risk. If a path is inferred, it should say so clearly. If something is confirmed, it should show the source.

That feels like the right boundary for a client-ready OSINT product.