OpenBox - Runtime governance for AI agents, wherever they run

byโ€ข
OpenBox helps teams keep AI agents controlled, compliant, and auditable while they operate. Enforce policies before actions execute, require human approval for sensitive operations, and maintain verifiable audit trails of every decision. Now integrated with 8+ frameworks and infrastructure platforms. OpenBox brings one consistent governance layer across the frameworks you already used to build and run production AI agents.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
๐Ÿ“Œ

Hey Product Hunt ๐Ÿ‘‹

Weโ€™re excited to launch the latest version of OpenBox.ai, now with an expanding ecosystem of ๐Ÿด+ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ for governing AI agents wherever they are built and run.

AI agents are gaining access to sensitive data, internal systems, communication tools, and real-world actions. But most teams still cannot clearly answer:

โ€ข What did the agent do?
โ€ข Was it authorized to do it?
โ€ข Which policies were checked?
โ€ข Who approved a sensitive action?
โ€ข Can we prove what happened later?

๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐˜ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—•๐—ผ๐˜… ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€.

๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—•๐—ผ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ.

It helps you:

โœ… Enforce policies before agent actions execute
โœ… Require human approval for sensitive operations
โœ… Monitor agent behaviour and risk in real time
โœ… Replay complete agent sessions
โœ… Maintain tamper-proof audit trails
โœ… Apply consistent governance across frameworks and systems
โœ… Map agent activities to regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act and NIST

You can add OpenBox ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ.

๐Ÿ”Œ ๐—ข๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€:

โ€ข Temporal
โ€ข LangChain
โ€ข LangGraph
โ€ข CrewAI
โ€ข Mastra
โ€ข Deep Agents
โ€ข CopilotKit
โ€ข n8n

๐—ข๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ:

Regardless of which framework you use, you should have one consistent way to control what your agents can do and prove what they did.

๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ:

โ€ข Which agent framework should we integrate with next?
โ€ข What is your biggest concern when moving agents into production?
โ€ข Which governance controls would make you more comfortable giving agents greater autonomy?

Thank you for checking out OpenBox. Weโ€™ll be here throughout the launch to answer questions and hear your thoughts! ๐Ÿ™Œ

๐Ÿ“š ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—•๐—ผ๐˜… ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป:

Governance usually becomes important only after teams start deploying agents at scale.

Curiousโ€”do customers adopt OpenBox because they need better security today, or because governance becomes a blocker as agent usage grows?

Runtime governance feels like the missing piece as more teams move from "AI agent demo" to actually running agents in production with real permissions at stake. Is this more about enforcing policy (blocking disallowed actions) or more about observability (logging/flagging what agents actually did)?