Yuki_Code1

When someone raised money, especially from a prominent VC with a strong reputation, like Antler or Y Combinator, the company immediately sounded more trustworthy to me.

But the latest analysis shared by @4kulia showed that in the first half of the year, only 26 launches were VC-funded.

We run 30+ models across six studios in Arteza and every one of them belongs to someone else. If a provider retires a version or quietly reweights it, the thing a paying user made last month stops being reproducible this month, and I have no changelog to hand them.

Pinning a version only delays it. The pin gets deprecated too, usually with a few weeks of notice, and the replacement is better on the benchmark and different on the exact prompts people have built habits around. Better is not the same as the same.

The part I don't have is detection. You'd need a fixed set of prompts running on a schedule with a person looking at the outputs, which is an eval suite for taste, and I've never seen one that works. So in practice we find out when someone writes in to say it used to look right.

If you're building on models you don't own, do you check for drift at all, or does a user tell you first?

There have been several articles about Apple in recent days from many angles.

For example: