Since I started shipping with Cursor and Claude Code, my PRs went from 20-line diffs to 800-line sprawls, and my review process hasn't kept up.
I've talked to engineers using everything from "read it carefully and pray" to running the full test suite on every PR to skipping review entirely on AI-authored changes.
What's your current ritual? Where does it break down? What would you want a pre-merge tool to actually tell you before you hit merge?
Most PR tools review the diff in isolation. MergeProtect builds a call graph of your whole codebase and works from impact.
- Reviews each PR against the functions, routes, and DB models it actually affects downstream.
- Generates tests (property, boundary, contract, mutation) scoped to the impacted code, with LLM self-healing.
- Runs k6 smoke tests on impacted API routes to catch latency regression.
- Sandboxed execution, PR-gating GitHub Action, optional prod traffic capture.
