How do you review the docs your AI coding tools generate?
AI coding tools are getting much better at producing work, but I keep running into a new problem: reviewing the output.
A single task can leave behind implementation plans, API notes, QA checklists, handoff docs, Mermaid diagrams, and HTML previews. These files are often scattered across project folders and mixed with source files, build outputs, logs, and dependencies.
I built MD+HTML Reader as a small macOS app for this review step. It opens a project folder, filters for Markdown and HTML, renders them in read-only mode, and helps you return to recently viewed or changed docs.
I’m curious how others handle this today:
Do you review AI-generated docs inside your editor?
Do you open Markdown and HTML in separate apps?
Do you keep generated docs, or delete them after the task?
What makes reviewing agent output painful in your workflow?
Product link:
https://indieseek.co/apps/md-html-reader/
I’d love feedback, especially from people using Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or other coding agents heavily.
Replies