Most legal AI tools make summarising, retrieving and drafting faster, whereas faster summaries do not necessarily produce better legal reasoning, and AI can still misread context or miss what matters. In my experience the real craft of law lies in judgment, i.e. reading, identifying what matters, spotting contradictions and deciding how the facts shape an argument, and one basic way lawyers exercise that judgment is that they read and they highlight.
That is where "May or Shall" begins: you highlight the passages that matter, each keeps its source, and those selections become the foundation for drafting with ChatGPT. We launch here soon and I would value your view before we do.
Read, highlight the lines that matter and keep every source. Link them across documents, then let ChatGPT draft from your own lines, so each sentence can be checked against the page it came from. Chrome extension, website, desktop app and ChatGPT app.
