Visual builder + your own coding agent: does this fit how you build?
Hi Product Hunt đź‘‹
We’re the team behind Mapples Creator, a visual builder for Expo and React Native apps. You design screens on a canvas, then wire up data, actions and navigation. What you get out is real Expo code, not a locked-in runtime.
You can build with AI in three ways:
Build in web (Beta): an assistant works on your canvas. You pick a style direction, review its plan, and it builds screen by screen. You can undo any turn in one click.
Build in agent: Claude Code, Cursor or Codex writes the code on your machine, at your own token cost. Sync goes both ways: code edits show up on the canvas, and canvas edits land in your TSX.
npx mapples create my-app --secret <key> --agent claudeMCP connector: use your Mapples projects from Claude or any MCP client, with no keys to copy.
claude mcp add mapples --transport http https://prod-us.mapples.org/mcp/
The runtime is open source (@mapples/*, MIT), and the output is plain Expo, Expo Router and EAS.
We’d love your input:
If you build mobile apps with AI today, where does it fall apart? Layout, navigation, state, or keeping code and design in sync?
Would you rather have the assistant inside the editor, or your own agent working with a canvas next to it?
What would make you trust exported code enough to ship it?
Designers: what’s missing for you to hand a canvas straight to a developer or an agent?
Bug reports, feature requests and blunt feedback are all welcome. We read every reply.
Try it: app.mapples.org · Docs: docs.mapples.org

Replies
Be the first to reply
Have a question or a thought to share? Add a comment above to start the conversation.