Compliance fails in the gaps between tools, so we built one platform

A question for the builders and fintech folks here: almost every compliance stack we've seen at regulated institutions is 6–10 point tools stitched together one for monitoring, one for screening, one for tax, one for Travel Rule, and the failures happen in the gaps between them, not inside any single tool. We bet the whole company on the thesis that fragmentation is the product problem, not an integration problem.

So, we're curious about your experience from either side: if you've built or bought compliance tooling, where did the stack actually break for you? And the deeper question we debate internally when you have to prove something to a regulator, auditor, or partner without exposing the underlying data, how do you handle it today? That trade-off (prove it vs. protect it) is what our zero-knowledge compliance work tries to dissolve, and we'd genuinely like to hear where else people hit it.

Happy to go deep in the comments on how we approach cross-chain intelligence, evidence-grade audit trails, or the federated model that lets institutions share risk signals without sharing data. Ask us anything including the hard ones.