Code review feedback is only useful if you understand the reasoning behind it
by•
PRFlow doesn’t just comment on a PR.
It explains why something matters.
It’s an AI agent that reviews GitHub pull requests
and lets you chat with it about the logic behind each suggestion.
That turns review from a checklist
into a conversation about the code.
We built it so teams can move faster
without losing understanding.
If you’re curious, here’s the link : https://www.graphbit.ai/prflow
58 views
Replies
A review that captures reasoning why a decision was made, what constraints existed, what was out of scope prevents future devs from undoing necessary decisions or repeating old debates. It’s like saving the team some déjà vu.
GraphBit
@emily_wheeler3 Exactly. Capturing the why turns a review into durable knowledge. When constraints and intent are explicit, teams stop relitigating past decisions and can build forward with confidence instead of déjà vu.
This hits a real pain point for me. I've fixed plenty of comments without fully understanding them. When the reasoning is clear, I learn faster and avoid repeating mistakes. That's when code review actually improves my thinking, not just my code.