Just suggested letting MentionFox users opt-in to share their monitoring dashboards publicly.
The idea sounds good in theory—people see what others are tracking, maybe discover new keywords or competitors they missed. But I'm skeptical it'll actually get used. Anyone shipping transparency features found people actually browse them, or does it just sit there?
59 views
Replies
curious whether user could choose exactly which widgets or data points are public instead of sharing the entire dashboard. That extra flexibility could increase adoption.
@new_user___090202674ab6e030a7a9c52 this could be an excellent way to build community knowledge. I’ve often wondered how power users structure their monitoring workflows, and public dashboards could provide those insights naturally.
I have seen public examples work well when they teach something. People usually engage more with useful insights than just looking at someone else's data.
Maybe adding templates from public dashboards could encourage people to explore and reuse them.
the difference between transparency features that get used and ones that just sit there comes down to one thing. is the dashboard interesting on its own, or only when paired with the watcher? public mentionfox boards work if the user feels other people scanning their board is itself a status signal. if it is just data archaeology, no one browses. the test is whether your top users would brag about being on a public leaderboard. if yes, you ship it and feature them. if no, the feature will sit. the structural fix is making the publicly browsable view a reputation surface, not a data dump.