EvidenceFlow - Systematic reviews from screening to meta-analysis

Hi Product Hunt 👋 I’m Robin, founder of EvidenceFlow. I built EvidenceFlow after seeing how difficult it is for researchers to manage a systematic review across disconnected tools: one for references, another for screening, spreadsheets for extraction, separate software for meta-analysis, and manual PRISMA reporting at the end. EvidenceFlow brings the workflow into one place: • Define PICO questions and eligibility criteria • Screen titles, abstracts, and full texts with blinded reviewers • Detect disagreements and resolve them with an audit trail • Extract structured study data • Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams from real project counts • Run fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis with forest and funnel plots • Export project data and outputs for reporting The core review workflow is free to use. AI-assisted screening and extraction are optional for teams that want help prioritizing and structuring work, while researchers retain control over final decisions. I would especially value feedback from researchers, students, librarians, epidemiologists, clinicians, and anyone who has completed a literature or systematic review: 1. Which part of the review workflow costs you the most time today? 2. What would make you trust or hesitate to trust a new evidence-synthesis platform? 3. Which free resource would be most useful: a PRISMA generator, PICO builder, extraction template, or meta-analysis calculator? Thank you for checking out EvidenceFlow. I’ll be here all day to answer questions and learn from your feedback.