Is employee productivity actually being measured wrong?

Hours worked, tasks completed, screenshots taken, activity levels… teams have more productivity data than ever.

But having more data doesn't necessarily mean understanding productivity better.

We’ve been building Dyzo to connect tasks, projects, time, activity, reporting, and AI so managers can understand what is actually getting done rather than just watching activity.

We’re launching tomorrow and I’m curious:

What metrics do you actually use to decide whether a team is productive? And which ones do you think are misleading?