I built CV Aligner around a narrow constraint: every suggested CV change should remain traceable to evidence the applicant supplied. It compares a CV with a real job description requirement by requirement, shows the supporting lines, and keeps employers, dates and metrics locked. If the evidence is missing, the product should expose the gap rather than write around it.

The free evidence report requires no account or payment. I do not yet have first-party evidence of improved interview outcomes, so I am looking for difficult test cases rather than endorsements. Which failure case would you test first: ambiguous transferable experience, conflicting dates, overly generic job descriptions, or something else?