Coil
The AI stock scanner you read β€” or the bot that trades it.
Start new thread

Coil - The AI stock scanner you read β€” or the bot that trades it.

byβ€’
Coil (coil.trade) is two products, one brain. Coil Scanner: every S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and macro name scored each market morning, $12/mo with a free daily preview and a click-around demo. Coil Trading Bot: your own AI agent runs it on your brokerage, $29 once. Not advice.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
πŸ“Œ

Hey Product Hunt β€” I'm Joey, a solo builder. Coil started as a system I built to trade my own account with my own AI agent. It's now two products that share one scanner brain.

Coil Scanner ($12/mo, free preview daily).Β Every S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and macro-book name scored each market morning β€” opportunity, entry state, hold strength β€” plus regime verdicts and two ranked buy lists. Read it in two minutes in your browser. There's a click-around demo of the real dashboard at , no signup.

Coil Trading Bot ($29 once).Β The same scanner running locally, plus a long-only engine your own AI agent operates β€” built for Claude Code, trading through Robinhood's official agentic accounts via MCP. It doesn't send you alerts. It scans, decides, places, and manages by rule, on your machine, with your keys. It ships with live trading OFF and stays off until you deliberately arm it.

The honest part, because it matters more here than anywhere:

  • The ranking brain backtests atΒ +638% for 2017–2026H1 vs SPY's +282%, survivorship-free. But through 2025 it ran roughly even with SPY at about a third less max drawdown β€” the edge concentrates in leadership regimes. That's research, not client returns, and the live engine is new.

  • The Scanner is an impersonal research publication: same board for every subscriber, no stop/target prices, not individualized advice.

  • Markets can lose money. Leveraged names can lose money fast. Nothing here promises you returns.

Roadmap's public at β€” crypto is on it, lined up to Robinhood's agentic-crypto rollout. Happy to answer anything: how the scoring works, why long-only, why one product became two, or what broke on the way here. β€” Joey ()

the scanner actually feels useful, scored names are clear and the support entries lined up with what i was watching on my own charts.

Maker

Β Thanks, that's honestly the best thing you could tell me. The whole point was to have it line up with what a good discretionary read would catch, just without sitting on the charts all day. If a score ever doesn't match what you're seeing, I'd genuinely want to hear it. Those mismatches are how it gets better.

Really liked what you have built here.
One query: If the process followed is the same for everyone, will it end up executing the same trade for everybody who deploys via coil?

Maker

Β Thanks Shams, appreciate it. Short answer, no, not the same trades.

Everyone's looking at the same shortlist of what's leading, that part is shared. But what actually gets executed drifts apart quick. Entries fire on pullbacks to real structure as they happen, so when you arm it and when a setup shows up both change the outcome. Your capital decides how many of the top names you can even fit, so people end up in different subsets. And each copy tunes its position sizing to your own fills over time, within hard limits, so two people aren't sizing the same way a month in.


If the real worry is crowding, everyone piling into the same names and killing the edge, at this scale it's a non-issue. These are big liquid large-caps. A few people running a $29 tool don't move OXY or the index. At real size it'd be worth watching, but it's long-only on liquid names, not a microcap edge that crowds the second two people find it.

Joey, congrats on launching Coil. The your agent, your broker, your keys framing is a clean way to describe self custody for a trading tool

Maker

Β Thanks Abhishek. Self custody is the right word for it, and honestly it wasn't a marketing decision. I wanted to run this on my own account and I wasn't willing to hand broker keys with trade permission to somebody else's server. That left exactly one design: the software comes to you, runs on your machine, drives your own brokerage. Nothing phones home. The framing was just the plainest way to say what was already true.

Maker