Hot take: the problem isn't too few AI agents — it's too little signal

by

Controversial opinion: we don't need more AI agents. We're drowning in them.

Every tool claims to be "the best." Every founder is "revolutionizing" something. Meanwhile you're stuck comparing 12 landing pages that all sound identical, with zero honest reviews to go on.

The bottleneck isn't innovation. It's trust and comparison.

Am I wrong? Is the flood of agents actually a good thing, or are we past the point of useful choice?

(For what it's worth — this frustration is literally why we built Agent Pantheon, a directory ranked by real user reviews. But I'd love to hear where people land on this.)

5 views

Add a comment

Replies

Be the first to comment