... prompt: use test-driven development, use QuickCheck, use fuzzing, use TLA+, audit first. Then he scored each run on a hidden test suite. That was the whole design. No instruction wildly beat the run with none. He had written down six guesses beforehand about which conditions would not outperform, and all six came true. What interested us was how the instructed runs failed, because the failures share a shape. Told to use QuickCheck, all of them used the library ... ... code did. Naming the technique gives the agent the motions of the technique. The check still comes from the agent's own reading of the spec, so the new framework fills up with the tests it would have written

... worked better for us: declaring intent in the morning instead of reporting history. "Here's what I'm picking up today" takes ten seconds, is answerable without memory, and produces something you can compare against reality at 6pm. Plan versus done, written

... them can be held against the world later and the other cannot. So the second half is not a new system, it is a field. Every ledger entry needs to name what would prove it happened, written at approval time by whoever understood the intent, because after the fact you will invent a criterion the outcome already satisfies. On the recovery channel, I have not built my end either, and mine is worse than yours. The only way to reach ... ... some of what it surfaces is politically inconvenient. The canonical definition doesn't get written

... taught me this is a legal docs tool I built after watching US freelancers get quoted 300 to 500 dollars by a lawyer for what is mostly standardised LLC paperwork. That sentence has a person, a bill and an alternative in it, so the product barely needs explaining. The ideas where I cannot write that sentence are the ones that stall, and in hindsight they deserved to. If the problem statement needs the word platform or the phrase ... ... line. Some problems only look unclear because you are not the audience feeling them. Comment from Arnold Oshenye(@oshylabs): Problem first, always. The test I use on my own products is whether the problem survives being written

... both content and   product work.   2. Google Search Console I basically live in it. For anything SEO, it's the only honest source of truth   about what's actually happening vs. what I assume is happening.   3. Ahrefs keyword and competitor