... house model being asked to explain itself than a bought classifier, because those usually hand back a probability and nothing else. also worth noting pangram themselves published a piece arguing perplexity and burstiness stopped working as signals, and gptzero moved off them around late 2023, so whatever is running here is more likely a trained classifier than the old statistical tests. Comment from Arnold Oshenye(@oshylabs): @guillermoescobar  That timing is the clearest evidence in this thread. Same person, same ... ... long as it isn t over reactive, I think it could be good! Comment from Ryan Miller(@ryanwrites): @alieksia  I'm worried about false positives too. I would prefer to be able to report something as being AI vs

... Nexus Humanum because I got tired of AI tools inventing citations. Ask ChatGPT for a lecture or lit review and it'll happily cite a paper that doesn't exist plausible author, plausible journal, zero real DOI. Funny enough, GPTZero just found 100 of these hallucinated citations in papers accepted at NeurIPS itself, so it's not just me being paranoid about this. So I built an AI lecture generator where every citation is real, indexed, and clickable sourced from ...

... recently compared Toolyzo, GPTZero, ZeroGPT, QuillBot, and Copyleaks using the exact same writing samples. One thing surprised me: The same paragraph received completely different AI scores depending on the detector. One human-written sample was flagged as 100% AI by one detector while others considered it human. A lightly edited AI paragraph fooled several detectors. It reminded me that AI detection is still far from an exact science. If you're building or using AI detectors: What has been your ...

... community! We just launched Purely Human ( purelyhuman.world ) - cryptographic proof that a human wrote something. The problem: AI detectors like GPTZero and Turnitin have 20-40% false positive rates. Students are getting expelled. Writers are losing clients. The trust in human content is broken. Our approach: Instead of detecting AI after the fact, we capture 12 biometric signals WHILE you type - keystroke dynamics, rhythm, behavioral patterns, and more. This gets sealed into a tamper-evident cryptographic proof that anyone can verify ...

... technical unit, we're launching Neo an innovative AI-powered software designed to tackle a growing challenge: detecting AI-generated content in online interviews. Detecting AI-generated responses: Analyzing text and audio (via ElevenLabs) to flag suspicious patterns. Leveraging GPTZero: For advanced AI content prediction. Seamless Integration: Works with popular platforms like Google Meet. Providing clear reports: So you can truly assess human talent. We believe that as AI advances, so must the tools that ensure authenticity and trust. Speed ...

... generated. Overall, they do their job, but I think even without such tools you can detect whether something is AI-generated. Comment from Chris Surita(@csurita): Quick answer: Yes. I've professionally been exposed to peers using Originality.ai and GPTZero. Some others, like Winston AI, can come out cheaper depending on when you visit their site, first time discounts, etc. ----- Long answer that might help you/others: This will actually depend on which content you're concerned with. Some are better ... ... generated, and vice versa. Comment from Matt Carroll(@catt_marroll): @fabricioferrero  ideally something someone can personally vouch for having used :) Comment from Tony Yan(@zhitao_yan): There are tons of such kind of APIs including zerogpt, gptzero