... past. For those of us who write short / informal emails or responses - what a win haha Comment from Daniel Zaitzow(@dzaitzow): @rohanrecommends I also noticed a fair amount of standard comment flags / upvoted from accounts who they deemed to be - not active enough OR overly spammy. I guess all of this in an attempt to keep the platform from becoming an AI cesspool of LLMs talking to eachother with humans as their proxies. Comment from Rohan Chaubey(@rohanrecommends): @alieksia ... ... long as it isn t over reactive, I think it could be good! Comment from Ryan Miller(@ryanwrites): @alieksia  I'm worried about false positives too. I would prefer to be able to report something as being AI vs

... bare minimum, honestly but then changing a few words doesn't fix the underlying problem which is that the thinking isn't there in the first place. You can tell immediately when someone's edited an AI draft versus when someone actually had a thought and used AI to sharpen it. completely different texture. Comment from Varun Dhamija(@varun_dhamija1): I think its less about more AI content but more about loads of people just outsourcing their thinking. The content ... ... running a real video pipeline, u basically never clock it as ai. and at that point whether it's "ai" or not stops mattering, the content lands, the point gets across. so detection's gonna stop being about ai vs

... launch a bit sooner. I'm really surprised how important it is to be chosen as a featured product as well. You don't stand a chance if you're not featured. I wish that products that aren't deemed to meet the guidelines stood a fairer chance by not being hidden from view in all places, but it is what it is. I believe our product met the guidelines, but probably many founders think the same. Our mistake there ...

... copy something, but in how appreciated, embraced, used is this creation in the first place. In the era of elon musks, that is the root cause. Comment from Whisk(@whisk): Imo even if it is not enforced or deemed redundant - having it sets a standard that people's work is to be protected, and hence should still remain. I think there are broader implications than just 'law not followed therefore useless therefore remove'. Same thing with human rights and lots ...

... through them, not legally but its murky, so they play it safe, also linkedin tries to be more about work than crypto etc. I think what you can do is sort of seperate your personal brand from what LI deems contraband. And instead create other flywhels for the "contraband content". And always keep it at arms length. You can promote things you build that are not directly connected to "illicit content". Like for instance. Create a substack brand ... ... /posts/andr%C3%A9-j-1676a2169_my-first-ai-wrapper-saas-is-live-it-took-activity-7286839942851289089-_Q2v?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAACglkF8BL8BVKYdqvbGYA0TYcmQeYZmgew8 as for your reach. Maybe your followers are stale, zoombie followers etc. or maybe you have exhausted your reach with non-preforming posts, in that case you will need to rebuild your reach by post more valuable content deemed