Today, Stride was recognized as a Featured Product on Product Hunt and finished among the top products of the day.
We're incredibly grateful.
To everyone who explored the product, upvoted, left feedback, challenged our thinking, shared the launch, or simply took the time to learn what we're building thank you.
What started as a simple frustration became Stride.
Software teams have more tools than ever before, yet execution remains fragmented.
Requirements live in one place.
Architecture in another.
Tickets somewhere else.
Tests, releases, documentation, and AI conversations scattered across the stack.
We built Stride around a simple belief:
Execution works better when context stays connected.
Today's launch wasn't the finish line. It was the beginning of a much larger conversation with builders, product teams, engineers, and organizations looking for a better way to move from idea to delivery.
A special thank you to everyone who supported us throughout the launch and to the Product Hunt community for the thoughtful discussions and feedback.
If you'd like to follow the journey, connect with us:
Website: https://www.stride.page
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company...
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/stride...
Product Hunt: https://www.producthunt.com/prod...
We're just getting started.
Team Stride
memi
The interesting part is keeping planning, design, and shipping in one loop. Most tools nail one of those then lose the thread.
Stride
@sarveshsea - Exactly this. "Lose the thread" is the perfect way to put it, that's precisely where it leaks, in the handoffs between tools. Keeping planning, design and shipping in one loop so the context carries through instead of getting re-explained at every step is the whole bet. 🙏
Congrats @kunalsharda . The switch I always feel is from “okay, we understand the feature” to “cool, now make tickets and ship them” That’s where a lot of useful context is lost in docs, chats, diagrams, and people’s heads.
Stride
@adrian_dorin_khiriac Thank you 🙏 That's the one that hurts most. "Now go make tickets" and half the thinking just disappears, then whoever's building it digs through old chats and diagrams to rebuild what everyone already knew last week. Honestly that handoff is the whole reason we built Stride. Appreciate you sharing this.
Stride
I’ve been using Stride heavily for AI-assisted full-stack development, especially with Codex and Claude Code through MCP, and this is where it really clicks.
The biggest value for me is the flow from product thinking to execution: PRD → epics → stories → acceptance criteria → test cases → implementation.
I can then hand that work off to an AI coding agent that has the full project context through MCP. That means the agent is not starting from a vague prompt. It knows the ticket, expected behavior, acceptance criteria, related test cases, and the current workflow state.
In practice, this makes the dev loop much tighter. Claude Code or Codex can pick up a ticket, work through the implementation, use the acceptance criteria as the target, run the relevant test cases, and move the ticket from To Do → In Progress → Ready for Review.
What I also like is that the workflow does not stop when implementation is done. Once a ticket moves into review, Codex can continue updating the work through MCP: adding comments, attaching relevant context or outputs, recording what changed, and keeping the ticket useful for the next person reviewing it.
For anyone building with AI coding agents, this solves a very real problem: the gap between “we planned the work” and “the agent actually has enough structured context to build the right thing.” Stride gives that context a home, and MCP makes it usable directly inside the development workflow.
If you’re doing AI-assisted development with Claude Code, Codex, or similar tools, I’d definitely recommend trying Stride.
🎁 Early-bird discount for the Product Hunt community: use code AAYUSH10
Stride
@aayushsharma That gap between "we planned the work" and "the agent has enough context to build the right thing" is the whole thesis, and giving that context a home through MCP is exactly what we were after. The bit about it not stopping at implementation is the underrated part too. Thanks for sharing the code with the community.
What used to take days of planning, grooming, and coordination can now be completed in under a minute. 👏
Stride
@prajeet_jain - Long road ahead, but what a day to be live. 🙌
Stride
I've had a front-row seat watching Stride come to life, and one thing that constantly stood out was how much time teams lose simply moving context between tools.
One doc becomes five tabs. One requirement becomes ten conversations. And before you know it, half the effort is spent reconnecting information instead of building.
Seeing Stride evolve from an idea into something that actually keeps planning, design, engineering, and QA connected has been incredibly rewarding.
I'd genuinely love to know: what's the one context switch in your daily workflow that frustrates you the most?
Every answer helps us build a better product. ❤️
Stride
@monish_mandavra1 - That line about half the effort going into reconnecting information instead of building, that's the exact moment we knew Stride had to exist. Now the real challenge is earning the one tab everything else collapses into.