Mentor by Skippr AI
AI Product Review, Right in Your Browser
580 followers
AI Product Review, Right in Your Browser
580 followers
AI agent that catches design, copy, and accessibility issues before you ship. Works on Localhost, Production, Figma, Lovable, Replit & more. Syncs with coding agents via MCP. Finesse reviews every screen against UX and product best practices, then gives you real-time feedback. See annotations directly on your UI, generate shareable reports with one click, or create tickets for Linear and Jira. Need deeper feedback? Talk to your AI design lead - the deepest product critique agent available.
Kaily
Love it! The amount of messages i send after a page goes live about how we still need to fix x and y and z. And the messages, screenshots, recordings i get from people saying, how could we go live! this is breaking....ughhh.
Brilliant!! I spent two decades designing UI/UX. This is a game-changer. Well done Sagi and team! 👏🏼
Reals by Hour One
Incredible product! It solves the last mile issue of native ai development. Very cool team Skippr 💪💪
Any plans to let Skippr actually implement the changes it recommends? That would be a huge leap from just feedback to real execution.
Hey@deepak_jangir7!
Definitely. Tighter, automated implementations for Skippr’s suggested changes are on the roadmap. You can already approximate this today through our MCP connection, which lets you send fixes straight to Claude Code, Cursor, or VS Code.
We started with feedback first because that’s the gap teams feel most—coding execution is already well covered right now. The goal is to close that loop over time!
Mentor by Skippr AI
@deepak_jangir7 Yes! We're actively exploring this.
Currently, Skippr provides context to coding agents like Cursor or Claude Code via MCP - they handle implementation. But we're definitely looking at the possibility of closing that loop entirely and having Skippr implement changes directly.
Lancepilot
Hey @odeth_negapatan1!
Really good questions- right now, we're more focused on supporting existing workflows. Replacing traditional specs/PRDs is definitely a talking point in many product/engineering circles at the moment, given the rise of vibe coding and such. Ultimately, I think it's a wider cultural question for organisations to abandon PRDs/specs, as it comes down to how certain teams prefer to work. I think Skippr can be useful in both instances.
Does it generate a generic review or are there different modes to test certain things?
Skippr AI
@pasha_tseluyko Great question! There are different levels of review: four topic-based agents and one “Head of Design” agent (the multimodal, real-time voice agent), which provides more strategic feedback.
Regarding generic vs. customized feedback, we already allow you to signal your preferences. For example, when you reject an issue, you can explain to Finesse why, and that context will be taken into account. In the future, we plan to offer more customization options, but keeping the experience simple was a key priority early on.
Humantic AI
Will Skippr agents eventually specialise beyond product feedback? E.g., architecture reviews, UX audits, testing strategies?
@ayushkumar1610 For now, we're pretty focused on product feedback however, we're also exploring areas across QA and other forms of visual-based feedback. Keen to hear what areas you have in mind though!