Launching today
Patchflow
Paste a bug. Get a pull request.
8 followers
Paste a bug. Get a pull request.
8 followers
System driven Patchflow turns GitHub bugs into reviewable pull requests. Paste a repo and describe the issue; it attempts a small, safe fix, verifies the change, and opens a PR you can inspect before merging. No auto-merge, no subscription—just $1 per repair attempt. Built for small bugs, annoying backlog items, and fixes that are too minor to spend hours on.automated bug repair.
Hi Product Hunt 👋
I’m Sean, the solo maker behind Patchflow.
I built Patchflow because I kept running into the same problem: small bugs, test failures, and simple code issues often take longer to deal with than they should. Existing coding agents are powerful, but many of them are subscription-based, usage-limited, or designed for broader coding sessions.
Patchflow is intentionally narrower.
The idea is simple:
One bug → one repair attempt → one reviewable pull request.
You paste a GitHub repo and describe the issue. Patchflow clones the repo in an isolated runner, attempts a small fix, runs available checks where possible, and opens a pull request for you to review.
A few principles shaped the product:
• No auto-merge. You stay in control.
• Small diffs over large AI refactors.
• Pay per repair attempt, not another monthly subscription.
• If Patchflow cannot produce a PR, you are not charged.
• Your code is never used for model training.
For launch, I’m starting with a simple early-access price: $1 per fix.
Because this is still an early product and I’m running the repair system with limited capacity, the queue is intentionally capped. If slots are full, you can join the waitlist and I’ll add credits for people who help test the product.
I’d love feedback from developers, students, indie hackers, and small teams.
Would you trust this workflow for small bugs? What would make the PR review experience better?