The React framework for production. Next.js provides zero-configuration automatic code splitting, filesystem based routing, hot code reloading and universal rendering.
The community submitted 508 reviews to tell
us what they like about Next.js, what Next.js can do better, and
more.
5.0
Based on 508 reviews
Review Next.js?
Reviewers largely see Next.js as the practical default for React teams: fast to start with, strong for SEO, and useful for combining marketing pages, app UI, and API routes in one codebase. Users repeatedly praise file-based routing, SSR/SSG, App Router, and solid production readiness, especially for small teams shipping quickly. Makers of Kilo Code and Bond echo that, citing strong developer experience and smooth real-time, app-like interfaces. The main complaints are confusing caching, uneven App Router docs, cryptic errors, and disruptive major-version changes.
+510
Summarized with AI
Pros
Cons
ReplayAutonomous app testing for teams who ship at AI-speed
Great React framework if you want to build fast, scalable web apps. Saves a lot of setup time. The developer experience is smooth, and the documentation is top-notch. On the flip side, it does have a bit of a learning curve if you're new to full-stack development or SSR concepts.
We use Next.js to power our web applications, leveraging its seamless integration with React components. It allows us to build fast, scalable, and SEO-friendly web applications efficiently. The framework’s server-side rendering and static site generation capabilities have significantly improved our performance and user experience
We use Next.js with TypeScript and love how it streamlines full-stack app development. The seamless integration of server and client components, type-safe data fetching helps us build and deploy with confidence. No more context switching between frontend and backend!
What's great
developer experience (26)TypeScript support (6)React integration (15)
Helps get up & running quickly and takes care of most UI best practices, we have been using it since 5 years now - However, it seems to be going downhill with the new versions which are filled with changes as if they are being made in a developer bubble.
I chose Next.js for ShowPR because of its SSR capabilities and easy routing, which work perfectly for a dynamic dashboard. I also considered using React alone, but Next.js' built-in features for server-side rendering and routing made it a more efficient choice for this project.
Next.js because it offers seamless full-stack capabilities with SSR, SSG, and API routes, optimizing performance and simplifying deployment. Its built-in TypeScript support and ease of use make it ideal for modern web development
What's great
fast performance (46)TypeScript support (6)static site generation (17)server-side rendering (25)API routes (11)
We can develop frontend and components faster than any alternative. CICD is quick and responsive than others. We considered alternatives like Gatsby and Remix but found Next.js to be the most efficient for our needs
Next.js powers our frontend, offering server-side rendering and optimized performance, ensuring a smooth, fast, and dynamic user experience when interacting with integrated tools like Google Workspace and HubSpot.
Allowed us to build an interactive and performant user interface, making knowledge visualization smooth and intuitive. The flexibility of React & Next.js helped us create a seamless graph exploration experience.
Server components make it much more efficient to reason about server side rendering and using / optimising assets. It also draws a clear line between what is client / server side rendered. The App router makes routing easy and allows for a nice folder structure.