Jira

How teams do great

4.7•154 reviews•

928 followers

How teams do great

4.7•154 reviews•

928 followers

Visit website

Project management software

•

Team collaboration software

•

Issue tracking software

Create and track feedback for Atlassian products.

The Best Jira Alternatives

The best Jira alternatives are Asana, Trello, Plane, Codegiant, and Zoho Projects.

Asana

4.6 ·

Choose Asana if...

✓you manage cross-functional launches with dependencies
✓you need tasks to live in multiple projects
✓you want stakeholder-friendly timelines and reporting

See details ↓

Trello

4.8 ·

Choose Trello if...

✓you want simple kanban anyone understands instantly
✓you run lightweight workflows for small teams
✓you rely on visual boards for quick handoffs

See details ↓

Plane

5.0 ·

Choose Plane if...

✓you want a cleaner jira-like experience
✓you need open-source or self-hosting control
✓you want built-in jira and confluence imports

See details ↓

Codegiant

5.0 ·

Choose Codegiant if...

✓you want project tracking with built-in git
✓you prefer one platform over multiple tools
✓you want fewer integrations to maintain

See details ↓

Zoho Projects

5.0 ·

Choose Zoho Projects if...

✓you need time tracking and project reporting
✓you run PMO-style delivery beyond engineering
✓you want classic project management structure

See details ↓

What to Consider

Jira is a default for many software teams because it’s built for structured issue tracking, agile workflows, and the kind of configurability larger engineering orgs rely on. But the alternatives landscape is broad: Asana leans into cross-functional execution with timelines and dependencies, Trello wins on simplicity-first Kanban for lightweight collaboration, Plane offers a cleaner “Jira-like” experience with an open-source/self-hosting angle, Codegiant consolidates planning with built-in Git, and Zoho Projects skews toward classic project management with time tracking and reporting.

In evaluating Jira alternatives, the key considerations were how quickly teams can onboard and collaborate (especially beyond engineering), how well tools scale from small projects to multi-team programs, and whether they support critical planning views like timelines/Gantt alongside boards. We also weighed pricing and plan gating as teams grow, plus integration depth (from Slack to Git hosting) and options like self-hosting or all-in-one suites that reduce stack sprawl.

Asana

Track, manage, and connect your projects across any team

4.6 · 81 reviews

Learn more →

Asana is built for cross-functional execution, making it a strong alternative to Jira when the work spans marketing, ops, product, and leadership as much as engineering. It emphasizes clarity around who owns what and when, with timelines and dependency tracking that help teams plan launches and coordinate handoffs without needing an engineering-first setup.

A key differentiator is how naturally Asana models work across multiple initiatives: the same task can live in more than one project, which is useful when stakeholders want different views without duplicating work. Templates and permissions make it easier to standardize how teams run projects, so new workspaces don’t require heavy configuration to be usable.

Asana typically feels lighter and more approachable than Jira, especially for external partners or non-technical collaborators. The trade-off is that advanced capabilities and automation can be gated to higher tiers, and costs can rise quickly as usage scales, so it’s best when the simplicity and multi-team coordination benefits outweigh the pricing curve.

Best for

Best for cross-functional teams that need timelines, dependencies, and stakeholder-friendly execution.

Standout features

✓Timeline view with dependencies
✓Tasks in multiple projects
✓Project templates and permissions
✓Multiple views: list, board, calendar
✓Collaboration built for non-technical teams

Trello

Visual collaboration with a shared perspective on projects

4.8 · 115 reviews

Learn more →

Trello wins when the priority is speed and simplicity rather than deep process governance. Its boards, lists, and cards are immediately understandable, which makes it a compelling alternative to Jira for teams that find traditional issue trackers too heavy for everyday coordination.

The visual workflow is Trello’s superpower: status is scannable at a glance, and teams can move work forward with minimal overhead. It’s especially effective for lightweight planning, creative production, content pipelines, and shift handoffs where clarity matters more than complex configuration.

Compared with Jira, Trello is less suited to large, dependency-heavy programs or advanced reporting needs. Many teams extend it with automation and add-ons, but once you need hierarchy, cross-project visibility, or rigorous agile controls, the simplicity that makes Trello great can also become the constraint.

Best for

Ideal for small teams that want lightweight kanban tracking with near-zero setup.

Standout features

✓Kanban boards with cards and lists
✓Checklists, labels, and due dates
✓Automation for routine workflows
✓Easy collaboration and sharing
✓Strong visual organization for quick scanning

Plane

AI-native project management

5.0 · 17 reviews

Learn more →

Plane targets teams that want Jira-like outcomes without the clutter and ceremony. It’s a strong alternative when the goal is to keep structured tracking for engineering while making the workspace approachable for product, marketing, sales, and customer-facing teammates.

The experience is designed to get teams moving quickly, with an interface that stays clean across multiple views like lists, boards, calendars, and timeline-style planning. That makes it easier to adapt the same underlying work to different working styles, without forcing everyone into an issue-tracker mindset.

Plane also stands out for openness and control: open-source and self-hosting options can be a deciding factor for teams with compliance needs or a preference for owning their stack. Built-in importers for Jira and Confluence reduce switching friction, which is particularly valuable for teams migrating established workflows and documentation.

Best for

Best for teams wanting a modern, simpler Jira alternative with open-source options.

Standout features

✓Open-source with self-hosting option
✓Multiple views: list, board, calendar
✓Timeline and Gantt-style planning
✓Intake for collecting requests
✓Jira and Confluence importers

Codegiant

Software Development Tool

5.0 · 1 review

Learn more →

Codegiant is geared toward teams that want to consolidate the software delivery toolchain rather than manage a patchwork of services. As an alternative to Jira, it’s most compelling when planning and issue tracking should live alongside code hosting in a single platform.

By combining project management with integrated Git repositories, Codegiant reduces the need to stitch together Jira with separate version control and related tooling. That can simplify administration, permissions, and day-to-day context switching, especially for teams trying to standardize on one system.

The trade-off is ecosystem flexibility: teams deeply invested in external Git hosting may prefer a tool that connects to existing repos in a more native way. Codegiant tends to fit best when the priority is an all-in-one suite and a streamlined workflow over best-of-breed integrations.

Best for

Ideal for engineering teams that want project tracking and Git in one tool.

Standout features

✓Integrated Git repositories
✓Issue and project management suite
✓Unified permissions and workspace
✓Reduced reliance on external integrations

Zoho Projects

Online Project Management Software & Tools

5.0 · 2 reviews

Learn more →

Zoho Projects is a strong alternative to Jira when the work looks more like project delivery than software issue governance. It’s designed around classic project management needs, with built-in time tracking and reporting that suit consulting, service delivery, and PMO-style teams.

Compared to Jira’s engineering-centric structure, Zoho Projects emphasizes broader execution management: tasks, schedules, and progress reporting are first-class, and time tracking supports visibility into effort and billable work. That can be a better fit when stakeholders care about project health, utilization, and deadlines as much as sprint metrics.

Zoho Projects also works well as a central place to route incoming work, turning feedback and requests into assignable tasks with measurable progress. The main trade-off is that teams seeking deep agile customization and software-specific workflow complexity may still prefer Jira’s specialized ecosystem.