Hi everyone — I'm Prasanth, founder of Adexorb in Kochi, India. Twenty years in enterprise IT, most of it as a product manager, and the last stretch running SEO for clients. What struck me last year: search isn't moving from traditional to AI. It's splitting. People still google, and they also ask ChatGPT — and whether an engine names you turns out to be a completely different question from whether you rank. Different signals, different rules. So I was paying for two sets of tools. One for technical and on-page health. One to check whether AI engines could read the site at all — and that second one only ever told me whether I was mentioned. Never which blocked crawler, which missing schema, which JavaScript-rendered page was the reason. I went looking for one tool that did both at a price I could justify. Didn't find it, so we built it. IndexGraph merges them: one crawl, one combined score across technical SEO, on-page, off-page, GEO and AEO. The Visibility Monitor doesn't report share of voice. It gives you the prompt, the engine, your position, whether you got a real citation or a passing mention, and whether the model sounded positive or neutral about you. Every finding ships with a Copy Fix — the change already written. The schema tool outputs paste-ready JSON-LD rather than advice. And we render JavaScript during the crawl, so you see what an AI crawler sees. That alone explains most React sites that pass Google and vanish inside ChatGPT. Where we're behind: we're new, and the big platforms have years of benchmark data we don't. What we have is the remediation layer, and a price a solo operator can actually run monthly. What's the one AI-visibility question you wish a tool would answer? — Prasanth

IndexGraph

Find and fix why AI engines don't cite your website

Find and fix why AI engines don't cite your website