Hireoven pulls jobs straight from company ATSs in real time, so you see roles minutes after they post instead of days later on job boards. Every role gets an AI match score and H1B sponsorship intelligence: petition history, approval signals, and visa language detected in the posting. Get instant alerts when a high match role drops, autofill applications on Workday, Greenhouse, Lever and more with the Chrome extension, and let Apex, your AI copilot, run the whole search.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Hireoven
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I built Hireoven after watching friends, and myself, burn months applying to roles that were either already filled or would never sponsor a visa.
Two problems kept coming up:
1. Job boards are stale. By the time a role hits the big aggregators, it is days old and buried in applicants. Hireoven crawls company ATSs directly (Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby and more), so roles show up minutes after they are posted, and alerts fire the moment a high match one drops.
2. For international candidates, sponsorship is a black box. You find out in the final round that they "can't sponsor at this time." Every role on Hireoven shows sponsorship intelligence up front: the company's H1B petition history, approval signals, and visa language detected in the job description itself.
On top of that, Apex (our AI copilot and Chrome extension) scores your fit, tailors your resume per role, and autofills the application, including the painful multi step Workday ones.
Free to try. I would especially love feedback from international job seekers. What would make your search easier? AMA, I will be here all day! 🚀
Report
the autofill-on-Workday part worries me more than it excites me, honestly. a lot of ATS systems already flag suspiciously fast or templated applications, and if the copilot is submitting a slightly-off tailored resume to a dozen roles an hour, that's a good way to get auto-rejected before a human ever sees it. how much does Apex actually customize per application versus reusing the same base resume with light edits?
Report
Maker
@galdayan That concern is valid, and it is exactly why Apex is not designed as a bulk auto-apply bot.
Apex does not submit applications on its own. It prepares the application, autofills where possible, and keeps the user in the review loop before anything is sent. The goal is not "apply to a dozen jobs an hour"; it is to help a candidate move faster on the few roles that are actually a strong fit.
On resumes, Apex starts from the user’s real profile and base resume, then customizes per role by reordering emphasis, adjusting the summary, highlighting the most relevant projects/skills, and matching language to the job description where it is truthful. It should not invent experience or blindly swap keywords. If the role is only a weak fit, Apex should surface that instead of forcing a fake tailored resume.
So the right way to think about it is: Apex saves the repetitive work around tailoring and form filling, but the applicant still owns the final decision and submission. We care more about high-quality, human-reviewed applications than high-volume automated ones.
Report
@felix_sarpong keeping a human in the loop before submission is the right call, that's the part that actually addresses the auto-reject risk rather than just making the applying faster. good to hear it's not trying to hit volume as the goal
Report
The real-time ATS feed is genuinely useful, I've already seen roles pop up here before they hit LinkedIn. H1B petition history is a smart touch too, saves a lot of guesswork.
Report
@felix_sarpong Love this Idea. Its difficult to find reliable information regarding H1-B sponsorships. Will keep an eye on this and suggest it to couple of friends
the autofill-on-Workday part worries me more than it excites me, honestly. a lot of ATS systems already flag suspiciously fast or templated applications, and if the copilot is submitting a slightly-off tailored resume to a dozen roles an hour, that's a good way to get auto-rejected before a human ever sees it. how much does Apex actually customize per application versus reusing the same base resume with light edits?
@galdayan That concern is valid, and it is exactly why Apex is not designed as a bulk auto-apply bot.
Apex does not submit applications on its own. It prepares the application, autofills where possible, and keeps the user in the review loop before anything is sent. The goal is not "apply to a dozen jobs an hour"; it is to help a candidate move faster on the few roles that are actually a strong fit.
On resumes, Apex starts from the user’s real profile and base resume, then customizes per role by reordering emphasis, adjusting the summary, highlighting the most relevant projects/skills, and matching language to the job description where it is truthful. It should not invent experience or blindly swap keywords. If the role is only a weak fit, Apex should surface that instead of forcing a fake tailored resume.
So the right way to think about it is: Apex saves the repetitive work around tailoring and form filling, but the applicant still owns the final decision and submission. We care more about high-quality, human-reviewed applications than high-volume automated ones.
@felix_sarpong keeping a human in the loop before submission is the right call, that's the part that actually addresses the auto-reject risk rather than just making the applying faster. good to hear it's not trying to hit volume as the goal
The real-time ATS feed is genuinely useful, I've already seen roles pop up here before they hit LinkedIn. H1B petition history is a smart touch too, saves a lot of guesswork.
@felix_sarpong Love this Idea. Its difficult to find reliable information regarding H1-B sponsorships. Will keep an eye on this and suggest it to couple of friends