Reviewers mostly see Framer as a fast, design-first way to build polished landing pages and marketing sites, especially for people already comfortable with Figma. They praise its responsive layouts, strong animation tools, quick publishing, and generally solid performance. Makers of Trupeer and Kodezi say it helped them ship animated sites quickly without engineering bottlenecks. The main caveats are familiar: onboarding can feel harder than expected, CMS and integrations are limited for complex sites, and pricing, billing, or support can frustrate some users.

+255

Summarized with AI

Pros

easy to use (53)

no-code platform (34)

fast performance (24)

animation capabilities (19)

responsive design (12)

AI design features (9)

CMS features (9)

Figma integration (9)

flexible canvas (9)

community support (7)

Cons

complex setup (9)

lack of advanced features (9)

limited CMS functionality (5)

high pricing (4)

unresponsive support (3)

real-time collaboration (2)

Pros

Cons

Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI

Promoted

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (202)

Other Reviews (56)

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)no-code platform (34)

As someone who builds complex backend architectures and deployment pipelines, spending days tweaking CSS and frontend layouts for a landing page is a massive productivity killer. Framer is fantastic because it perfectly aligns with the "build and ship fast" mindset. It allows me to design and publish highly responsive, visually stunning websites in hours instead of days. The performance out of the box is incredible, and the no-code environment feels intuitive, letting me focus my coding efforts on the actual core product rather than the marketing site.

What needs improvement

While it's the perfect tool for fast landing pages, the CMS functionality can feel a bit restrictive if you are trying to build more complex, data-driven structures. Additionally, if you are an indie hacker or a developer spinning up multiple micro-projects and staging environments, the pricing structure per site can scale up faster than expected compared to traditional hosting.

vs Alternatives

I considered Webflow, WordPress, and simply hard-coding my landing pages from scratch using Next.js and Tailwind CSS. I chose Framer over custom coding because it dramatically reduces my time-to-market. I chose it over Webflow because Framer's interface feels much more like a modern design tool (similar to Figma), making the transition from design to a live, fast-performing site completely seamless without a steep learning curve.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

809 views4mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)community support (7)Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)AI design features (9)responsive design (12)CMS features (9)animation capabilities (19)flexible canvas (9)

Framer has revolutionized how I prototype and ship interactive websites. With 8+ years in UI/UX and 200+ projects shipped—including standout sites for Hoffman Homes and Doceo—Framer's blend of design freedom and no-code deployment saves my clients time while delivering highly polished, interactive results. Animation and responsive design tools are top-notch, and Figma integration simplifies handoffs and iterations. Community support for tough challenges is a major plus.

What needs improvement

unresponsive support (3)complex setup (9)high pricing (4)real-time collaboration (2)lack of advanced features (9)limited CMS functionality (5)

Framer's steep learning curve may challenge non-technical designers switching from Figma—transition guides and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption. CMS flexibility is solid, but advanced filtering or more robust relationships, like in WordPress, would unlock more use cases. Editor performance slows on heavy, animation-rich pages; more optimization would help agency use. Real-time collaboration is good but could be more robust, with conflict resolution and version tracking. And, a broader range of enterprise-grade templates would make project starts even faster.

vs Alternatives

I chose Framer because it uniquely combines prototyping power with production-ready deployment. Unlike Figma (design only) or Webflow (steeper learning curve), Framer lets me iterate quickly and ship polished, interactive sites directly to clients. The animation capabilities and no-code flexibility give me the creative control I need without sacrificing speed.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

947 views9mo ago

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)animation capabilities (19)

Framer is incredibly easy to use once you get past the basics. The no-code approach is genuinely powerful and allows designers to ship production-ready websites without writing code. Performance is fast both in the editor and on live sites, even when using animation-heavy layouts.

Animation capabilities are one of Framer’s biggest strengths — creating smooth interactions and modern motion feels natural and intuitive. On top of that, the Figma integration is seamless, making the transition from design to a live, interactive website surprisingly frictionless.

What needs improvement

complex setup (9)

The biggest challenge is the initial setup. Framer can feel overwhelming at first, especially for new users, and the learning curve is steeper than expected for a no-code tool. Some advanced features are still missing or limited, and pricing can feel high for individuals or early-stage projects.

The CMS works well for simpler use cases but becomes restrictive for more complex content structures. Improving onboarding, documentation, and flexibility in these areas would make the experience even stronger.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

614 views6mo ago

•9 reviews

Amazing concept. It appears to be in its early stage of development. I love how fast the AI generated a design. The generated text was spot on and clearly communicated the value prop. The typography was beautiful. But sadly, it's very formulaic (only a few templates and isn't free flow) and has a long way to go before widespread usage. The chosen colour palettes were bland and didn't usually follow the website's theme. The generated images were weird and, most times, felt random. I'm super excited, though, as to where they will take this from here. Looking forward to future updates.

What's great

fast performance (24)AI design features (9)

What needs improvement

lack of advanced features (9)

Report

138 views1yr ago

•1 review

Great for Simple Websites, But Limiting for Advanced Needs Some Key Issues: Lack of CMS Flexibility: Framer's CMS is quite basic. For projects requiring robust content management, it doesn't hold up compared to platforms like Webflow or custom-built solutions. The Notion API implementation is limited—for example, you can’t display inline videos in database pages. Single Password Page Protection: There’s no easy way to set up single password protection for individual pages, which makes creating private areas or restricted content unnecessarily complex. Localization Options: Localization is to expensive, making it a poor choice for multilingual sites. No Zapier Integration: Framer doesn’t natively integrate with Zapier, requiring workarounds like using fetch to connect external automation tools manually. Overpriced for Limitations: The platform’s pricing doesn’t align with its feature set. Competitors like Webflow offer far more flexibility and functionality at a comparable cost, while custom Next.js sites provide even greater scalability for professional projects. Unresponsive Support: Customer support is often slow to respond, which compounds the frustration of trying to work around the platform’s restrictions. Also don't really resolve issues. Conclusion: Maybe great for simple websites. For me it is not suitable for projects requiring advanced CMS functionality or integrations. For these needs, tools like Webflow, Zapier-friendly platforms, or a custom-built Next.js site are far superior and cheaper. Given the limitations and high price point and poor support, I often can’t recommend Framer to my clients as-well.

What needs improvement

unresponsive support (3)complex setup (9)high pricing (4)limited CMS functionality (5)

Report

115 views1yr ago

•6 reviews

It still has a way to go to be able to compete with the advanced functionalities of Webflow but it is a good tool for making simple websites. → The benefits compared to Webflow: Cheaper, easier to use and learn. Launch faster. Insert quick pre-made animations and interactions. → Where Webflow still is king: Advanced and complex websites are not a thing in Framer right now. For sites with big CMS Framer still lacks many functionalities. If you are a designer Webflow freedom to build anything as you imagine is amazing, Framer sites, on the other hand, look all alike the same with these rounded squares modules, etc. If you are a developer, Webflow will give you much more freedom by tweaking and customizing the code. If they keep developing Framer at the pace they are doing it, I have no doubt it will become a designer and developer's tool of choice sooner than later.

What's great

easy to use (53)animation capabilities (19)

What needs improvement

lack of advanced features (9)limited CMS functionality (5)

Report

99 views3yr ago

•1 review

I have to say this version is way much more friendly to the no-code. Though I understand how framer is trying to create a middle shared ground for the no-code and the code-savvy, the bar was high if an intrigued user who has zero background in design or coding wants to get his/her hands on framer. However, there are still a lot of problems with the coding part. Like, my colleague and I were once accidentally trying to add on the coding lines at the same time, and something went wrong, and the whole project blew up and shut down... lol... don't do the coding at the same time... one person at each time...

What's great

no-code platform (34)

What needs improvement

real-time collaboration (2)

Report

83 views3yr ago

•4 reviews

I'm a product designer so I am always experimenting with tools as early as I can to illustrate a concept. From the onboarding and interactive tutorial to the simplicity of the UI, Framer has been wonderful to use. Also I'm not sure if people know but there is even a plugin in Figma called Framer Copy Paste where you can copy your design and paste right into Framer. Some of my favorite things about Framer are: - The way they do component creation + variants - Style management - Breakpoints - Ease of use

What's great

easy to use (53)Figma integration (9)

Report

86 views4yr ago

•1 review

Honestly, I couldn’t have asked for a better tool. I love the look and feel of many Webflow pages, but setting one up was way too technical and time-consuming for us. With Framer, I was able to set up and launch our AdAmigo.ai website after just one afternoon of work — and we’ve never outgrown it since. I can A/B test landing pages with just a few minutes of configuration, we launched a blog, and we’ve been able to achieve everything else we needed. Love Framer!!

What's great

easy to use (53)no-code platform (34)CMS features (9)

Report

92 views10mo ago

•2 reviews

I really like the concept behind f4ramers, the platform feels fresh and has a lot of potential for creators who want flexibility and control. The UI is clean, and onboarding was smoother than I expected. Definitely feels like something that can stand out in its niche. That said, a few things could be improved: performance can feel a bit laggy at times, and some features feel half-baked (especially compared to more mature competitors). The community aspect is promising, but it still feels quiet and needs more engagement to really shine.

Report

54 views10mo ago

Integrity

•4 reviews

I learned about Framer from a designer on my team. Tried building my first landing page with it. I won't lie, there's a bit of a learning curve, but the experience is very intuitive. The tutorials really impressed me with their quality and simplicity. I used the AI prompt to generate a sitemap for a children's educational product website. Loved the templates! Then I iterated on the text, block layout, and played with the color scheme. Finally, I exported the result to Figma. Ended up with a solid, good-quality basic website that definitely streamlined the content and design development work. If only I could have published the site directly on Framer, it would have been perfect!

What's great

Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)AI design features (9)template marketplace (3)

What needs improvement

complex setup (9)

Report

328 views1yr ago

used Framer to build Minduck Discovery

•17 reviews

We rebuilt our official website to better showcase our product details and foster community engagement, and Framer played a pivotal role in this process. Acting as both a front-end and partial back-end engineer, Framer significantly reduced our development time and resource requirements. Its designer-friendly interface saved us countless hours, allowing us to focus on what truly matters: delivering the best product experience to our consumers. Framer’s seamless integration of design and development made it an indispensable tool for our team.

What's great

easy to use (53)no-code platform (34)animation capabilities (19)

Report

209 views1yr ago

used Framer to build Cheers (YC S24)

•15 reviews

I love Framer. We were building our own website and landing page before, but switched to host our landing page on framer so we could spend more engineering time on building a compelling web-app & companion app! If you're looking for a good way to build a really good looking landing page, Framer is great. Also great for creating MVPs. Generally difficult to build a real web-app or product on, but for almost everything else it's amazing. Figma and Canva are awesome for design but being able to publish changes yet have similar functionality is incredible.

What's great

no-code platform (34)animation capabilities (19)

What needs improvement

lack of advanced features (9)

Report

158 views2yr ago