Reviewers mostly see Cursor as a fast, context-aware coding assistant that fits naturally into everyday development, helping with debugging, refactoring, boilerplate, multi-file edits, and understanding large codebases without leaving the editor. Several users say it beats Copilot and reduces context switching, while some non-engineers say it lowers the barrier to building software. Feedback is not uncritical: reviewers repeatedly warn that output still needs review, and they call out inconsistent pricing, high token burn, occasional stalls or instability, verbose suggestions, and some friction from its VS Code fork and frequent restarts.