Launching today
Connect Google Search Console, Google Analytics, import your Ahrefs or Semrush lists, and crawl your site on 200-point technical SEO Audit. CrawlRaven joins all four and hands back a ranked plan: what to write, what to update, what to fix first.
How often does it re-analyze new findings once I've worked on first few??
CrawlRaven
@axebarma It discovers new keyword opportunities based on the content published, what keywords it already rank for and what can potentially rank for more. The analysis becomes even richer if you add your target keyword list with data from tools like Ahref. With time, you get more data and hence new opportunities are identified. Let me know if this answers your question.
CrawlRaven
@axebarma GSC data syncs from Google automatically every day, so findings update on their own as your changes take effect. No need to re-run anything. Just note Google reports search data with about a 2 day delay, so give fixes a couple of days to show up.
This is awesome! Checking it out later this week. Do you have MCP support?
CrawlRaven
@parthkoshti Yes we do. Available on top tier plan.
If I pay for Ahref, what would make me switch to this?
CrawlRaven
@nishant_modi Ahrefs looks outward, competitor backlinks, the full keyword universe, what everyone else ranks for. CrawlRaven looks at your own Search Console data and tells you what to do with it. Which pages sit one push from page 1, where two of your pages fight over the same term, which pages are quietly losing traffic.
Most people keep Ahrefs for research and use us for the weekly "what do I work on now" list. You can even import your Ahrefs keywords straight in.
the impact-ranking questions are all covered well, but I'm more curious about the white-label report narratives since that's the part agencies will forward straight to non-technical clients without necessarily editing the wording. a plain-English "why" for a ranking drop or a prioritized fix is easy to state confidently even when the real cause is multiple overlapping factors. is there anything that keeps the generated narrative hedged when the underlying data doesn't clearly support a single-cause story, or is that something the agency has to catch themselves before sending it out?
the ranked what-to-fix-first output is the actual value here. every seo tool hands you 200 issues and lets you drown in them, the hard part was never finding problems, it was knowing which three actually move rankings this month. good angle joining gsc and the crawl to decide that instead of just showing it
CrawlRaven
@alex_watson2110 Thanks Alex!
The "what to do next" framing is the right one. GSC will tell you a page is "Discovered, currently not crawled" and then leave you guessing whether that's a technical problem or a site-quality problem. Does the ranked plan distinguish between genuinely technical fixes and pages that just need stronger internal links or better content? That distinction is where I've burned the most hours on my own site.
Pulling GSC and GA4 into one place is the part I always end up duct-taping together myself. Does the 200-point crawl check anything for AI search / GEO yet or is it still classic SEO? That's where I keep hitting walls lately.