ContractRev
AI contract review that takes YOUR side
7 followers
AI contract review that takes YOUR side
7 followers
Most contracts are written against you. Upload yours and our AI reads it from your side—flagger,freelancer, employer. Spot traps in 2 min, get suggested rewrites, export a redlined DOCX. No lawyer needed. Free to try.
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I'm Hason, a solo developer from Chongqing. Last year I moved into a new apartment, signed the lease without reading the fine print, and lost nearly my entire security deposit when I moved out. The landlord pointed to vague clauses about "professional cleaning standards" and "normal wear and tear" — terms the contract never defined. I couldn't afford a lawyer for a rental dispute. So I built ContractReview.
What it does:
Upload a PDF or DOCX. Tell it who you are in the contract — freelancer, tenant, employer, landlord. The AI reads the entire document from YOUR perspective. Same clause, completely different risk score depending on which side you're on.
In about 30 seconds you get:
Section-by-section risk breakdown — color-coded, every clause scored 0-100
Plain-English explanations — not legal jargon. "This means they can sue you for things that happened before you signed"
Track-changes DOCX — red strikethrough + blue rewrites, ready to send back to the other party
Jurisdiction-aware analysis — US, UK, EU, China, Japan, Australia. Standards differ by country and the AI knows the difference Covers NDA, employment, rental, service agreements, SaaS, and more.
What I've built since last time:
When I first launched here, it was a simple upload → risk report tool. Since then I shipped:
Clause-by-clause analysis with legal citations
Multi-jurisdiction legal database (16 NDA standards across 6 countries)
Perspective-aware review — the AI literally takes your side
DOCX export with inline track changes (the OOXML spec and I are no longer on speaking terms)
Custom playbooks — set your own thresholds for liability caps, notice periods, IP terms
Tech: Next.js 14 + DeepSeek + Neon PostgreSQL + Vercel. Built evenings and weekends from Chongqing.
Pricing:
Free: 3 contract reviews (no card)
Pro: $9.99/month
Ultimate: $19.99/month
PH Code: PHRELAUNCH — 50% off first 3 months
What I'd love from you:
Try it with a contract you've actually signed — that's when it gets interesting. The results are usually eye-opening when you already know what the document says.
I'm in the comments all day. Tell me what sucks, what's missing, what you wish it did. I built this for people who sign things hoping they didn't miss anything important. You're my product team.
— Hason
How does the AI handle contracts in jurisdictions outside the US, and does it pick up on subtleties in non-English contracts or translation quirks that could throw off the risk scoring?
@halit1216089
Great question! Here's how ContractReview handles this:
Jurisdiction detection: The AI automatically identifies the governing law jurisdiction from the contract text itself (e.g., "This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore"). Contract type and jurisdiction are both detected and displayed in the report header so you can verify them immediately.
Non-English contracts: Our primary AI backend is DeepSeek, which has strong multilingual capabilities —it handles Chinese, Japanese, and other major languages natively. For CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) contracts, we even embed CJK fonts in the PDF reports automatically. The risk scoring logic is language-agnostic —it evaluates clause fairness, missing protections, and unbalanced terms regardless of language.
Translation quirks: This is a real concern. We recommend analyzing contracts in their original language when possible. If you must analyze a translated version, be aware that machine translation can introduce ambiguity that affects risk scoring. The AI will flag unclear or ambiguous language in the "explanation" field —that's often a signal to double-check the original text.
Honest caveat: ContractReview is designed as a first-line screening tool, not a substitute for jurisdiction-specific legal advice. For high-value cross-border contracts, we recommend having a local attorney review the AI's findings. The AI catches 80% of common issues (unbalanced liability, missing termination clauses, vague IP language) that are universal across most legal systems —but local nuance always matters.
What's next: We're actively working on better multi-jurisdiction support —including jurisdiction-specific risk rules (GDPR for EU contracts, different liability standards for common law vs. civil law systems) and native-language UI. If there's a specific language or jurisdiction you'd love to see prioritized, I'm all ears —real user feedback shapes our roadmap.
Really appreciate the thoughtful question! 🙏