i like it. it's everything i want in a rss reader minus some share settings. in particular, i'd like to be able to tweetdeck, reddit, and slack. it's a really great tool, and free! fyi tho, if cappuccino were looking to monetize, it's the sharability of the content in the reader that i'd pay for as a PRO-level upgrade or whatever. either way, five stars and two thumbs up for cappuccino.
As a long-time user of Reeder, I'm pretty disappointed at just how similar Cappuccino's UI/UX looks. After using it briefly, it's easy to see the fit and finish of Reeder has not been approached by Cappucino; but, still, the intention is quite clear.
It's hard for me to articulate why this is so bothersome, but it feels *really*... not right.
For those seeking a best-in-class newsreader app (and for those who have commented on the "clean" abd "elegant" UI), Reeder is unbelievably good on Mac and iOS.
I wish the developers well, but hope they can find a more unique vision for Cappuccino.
Report
This looks *very* similar to Reeder. Can you point out some of the differences?
i like it. it's everything i want in a rss reader minus some share settings. in particular, i'd like to be able to tweetdeck, reddit, and slack. it's a really great tool, and free! fyi tho, if cappuccino were looking to monetize, it's the sharability of the content in the reader that i'd pay for as a PRO-level upgrade or whatever. either way, five stars and two thumbs up for cappuccino.
Pros:clean ux, lightweight, simple, readable...and totally free!!!
Cons:share settings are bare bones, could be more robust