Launched this week
Business Idea Validator
13 AI agents validate your business idea in minutes
3 followers
13 AI agents validate your business idea in minutes
3 followers
Validate any business idea with 13 specialized AI agents in minutes. Get market research, financial projections, GTM strategy, brand identity, and more. Each agent is a domain expert: market researcher, financial planner, legal advisor, growth hacker, and 9 more, all running in parallel. You get a viability score, pitch deck, business plan, GTM playbook, investor matching, startup valuation, and 52 tools. Free to start. No consultant needed.
@richard_leclezio Honest answer to "what's missing": the friction point isn't generating the validation artifacts — it's trusting them. 13 agents producing a viability score, pitch deck, and 90-day plan in 5 minutes is impressive throughput, but a solo founder's real question is "would this output survive 30 minutes with a skeptical VC or a domain expert?" Curious if you've run blind tests where the BV output goes head-to-head with a human consultant's deliverable, and someone unaffiliated picks which is which.
@artem_fedorovich Artem, you’re exactly right, the hard part isn’t generating artifacts, it’s trusting that they’d hold up in front of a skeptical VC or domain expert. Right now BV is great at fast, structured validation from a single idea description. The next big focus is making that output more defensible: I am planning blind benchmarks against human consultants, an assumptions layer that exposes the “why” behind key numbers, a red‑team mode that tries to break your idea, and confidence scores that highlight where the plan is strong vs. shaky. Once those pieces are in place, I’d love to share results from the first blind tests and get your take on how close we are to “VC‑proof.
@richard_leclezio Love this answer - the red-team mode is the piece I'd watch closest. "Validation" tools tend to be optimistic by default (the AI wants to help, so it helps), and an explicit agent whose job is to break the idea is the only honest counterweight.
Definitely interested in the blind benchmark results when you have them — drop a note here or ping me on X (@nostrinsurer) and I'll give you proper feedback. Rooting for this 🤝
@nostrinsurer @artem_fedorovich love this, and totally agree that “would this survive 30 minutes with a skeptical VC?” is the real bar.
Quick update since my last comment: I’ve just shipped two trust-focused features aimed exactly at that problem:
VC Stress Test: Reads all 13 agent outputs and generates 10 hard, seed‑stage VC questions tailored to your idea, each tied to the specific weakness or unvalidated assumption it’s probing, with a severity rating, suggested answer, Fundability Score (1–10), and a clear “would I take this meeting?” verdict.
Assumption Register: Automatically pulls out the 10–15 core hypotheses behind your numbers and claims, shows the downside if each is wrong, and suggests how to validate them. You can track them from Uncertain → Validated → Invalidated, and it highlights the few that are true business‑killers if they don’t hold.
These are the first steps toward the blind benchmarks and dedicated red‑team mode we talked about. Once I have the initial benchmark results, would love your take on how close this feels to “honest, VC‑grade” validation. Try the app out and run a business case against it