Viktor.comAn AI coworker that actually does the work
Promoted
Avarieux
It checks out.
8 followers
It checks out.
8 followers
Your favorite AI will invent a P/E ratio with a straight face. Finance influencers cite vibes. Group chats cite "trust me." We built the opposite, on one unhinged rule: if a number can't be traced to an actual SEC filing or Fed release, it doesn't get shown. At all. Every figure links to its source. Daily briefs, watchlist event alerts, valuation models that show their homework, a permanent archive. Free tier, 7-day trial, no card. First 100 verified users become founding. It checks out.
Finally tried it and the source-linked numbers alone make it worth keeping around, I kept clicking the citations just to see how deep they go.
@taner14yy Taner, you just described the design goal better than my own landing page: the citations are supposed to survive exactly that "how deep does this go" test. Every layer you click through ends at a primary record (the SEC filing, the Fed release); if you ever hit a floor before you reach one, that's a bug and I want to hear about it loudly.
Since you're already poking: try the daily brief tomorrow morning and tell me if you'd read it before a commute or if it needs to be shorter. That's the question I'm collecting real answers to today.
And thank you for being review number one. In a product built on receipts, you're now permanently cited.
About the one-rule sourcing pitch: a P/E needs a share price, and prices don't live in SEC filings or Fed releases. What counts as a traceable source for the market-data half of a computed number? Congrats on the launch, Yash.