Launching today

Avarieux

Launching today

It checks out.

3 followers

It checks out.

3 followers

Visit website

Your favorite AI will invent a P/E ratio with a straight face. Finance influencers cite vibes. Group chats cite "trust me." We built the opposite, on one unhinged rule: if a number can't be traced to an actual SEC filing or Fed release, it doesn't get shown. At all. Every figure links to its source. Daily briefs, watchlist event alerts, valuation models that show their homework, a permanent archive. Free tier, 7-day trial, no card. First 100 verified users become founding. It checks out.

Free Options

Launch tags:Fintech•Investing•Artificial Intelligence

Launch Team / Built With

ElevenAgents by ElevenLabsScale conversations without scaling your team

Promoted

Maker

📌

Hey PH 👋 I'm Yash, and I have a controversial opinion: AI should not be allowed to make up numbers about your money. Wild take, I know. Two years ago I landed in Newark with two suitcases. Collected an inbox full of "unfortunately" emails (I counted; searching "unfortunately" in my Gmail returns 153 results, and yes, that's a cited claim). So last May I graduated, incorporated the same day, and built the thing I couldn't stop thinking about. Monday it's 40 feet tall in Times Square, which is objectively insane for a guy whose engineering team is AI agents and a rule. The rule: if a figure can't be traced to a primary public record, it isn't shown. Not flagged with a cute warning icon. Not shown. There was a week before launch where my own verification gate rejected 95% of everything my pipeline produced. I fixed the pipeline. The gate doesn't negotiate. (It rejected a dossier three times yesterday over one unsourced earnings date. I've never been prouder of software for refusing to work.) What you actually get: daily research briefs on your watchlist, alerts when filings and insider trades hit your names, valuation models with their assumptions in the open, and every single number linking to the SEC filing or Fed release it came from. Free tier to poke around, 7-day trial with no card, first 100 verified signups become founding members. Two things I genuinely want your take on: the citation UX; tap any number and the source filing opens; is that fast enough that you'd actually check, or does it need to be even more frictionless? And the daily brief format, would you read it before your commute, or should it be shorter? Beyond that: roast me, test it, and if you find a number in there without a receipt; comment it. Publicly. That's the whole product promise and I'll be here all 24 hours to answer for it. Trust me bro is not a source. This is.

Report

1d ago

Finally tried it and the source-linked numbers alone make it worth keeping around, I kept clicking the citations just to see how deep they go.

Report

3h ago

Maker

@taner14yy Taner, you just described the design goal better than my own landing page: the citations are supposed to survive exactly that "how deep does this go" test. Every layer you click through ends at a primary record (the SEC filing, the Fed release); if you ever hit a floor before you reach one, that's a bug and I want to hear about it loudly.

Since you're already poking: try the daily brief tomorrow morning and tell me if you'd read it before a commute or if it needs to be shorter. That's the question I'm collecting real answers to today.

And thank you for being review number one. In a product built on receipts, you're now permanently cited.

Report

6m ago