Viktor.comAn AI coworker that actually does the work
Your customers ask ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude before they ever reach Google. AI Visibility checks how those assistants talk about your brand: whether they name you, who they name instead, and which sources they trust. You get a visibility score, a competitor leaderboard, an AEO audit of your site, and a fix list you can act on the same day. Free to run on any brand and website.
@baliy that answers the diagnosis side well. does the loop close at all, though - once I know I'm missing from a specific Reddit thread or roundup, does AI Visibility help track whether fixing that (getting mentioned there, or on the source it flagged) actually moves my score in the next scan? or is it purely diagnostic and the before/after verification is on me to notice next time I run the check
@omri_ben_shoham1 Honest answer: today it's mostly diagnostic, and the loop only half-closes. Your scans are saved, so the before/after is there — you can see whether that source now cites you and whether the cluster moved. But the tool doesn't connect the two for you and declare "this fix earned you +8", you have to read it yourself on the next scan.
And I'm careful about that not just because it's unbuilt. Real attribution here is genuinely hard: you get into that thread, but the same month a competitor publishes, a model updates, and the answer shifts anyway. Any tool handing you a clean "this action caused that number" is overselling it.
Where I want to land is the honest middle: let you mark when you made a change, show the before/after around it, surface whether the source you targeted actually shows up now, and let you judge causality with the context in front of you. Closing that loop properly is the thing I care most about, it's just not there yet.
The competitor leaderboard idea is genuinely useful, most AEO tools stop at your own score and leave you guessing who is actually winning those prompts.
@seherkrmacmvsb Thanks, that's exactly the gap that always bugged me. Your own score in a vacuum doesn't really tell you anything, "am I winning or losing" only means something against who's actually showing up for those prompts. Glad the leaderboard framing clicks for you too.
Macaly
GEO is gonna be a real budget line soon, good timing 🚀 do you track competitor mentions too?
@petrkovacik Thanks. And yes, that's actually the core of it, every scan pulls who else gets named alongside you, so you end up with a leaderboard of who's winning those prompts and which sources they're cited from.
Love how it surfaces which sources the assistants actually trust rather than just giving a vague score, that level of detail makes the fix list feel actionable instead of generic.
@atlkulac3065 Thanks, that's really the whole bet. A score tells you you're losing but not what to touch; the sources are the part you can actually act on, get into that roundup, fix that page, earn that mention. Means a lot that it reads as actionable and not just another dashboard. Appreciate you taking the time to dig in.