Launching today

AI Emaily
Your AI inbox that writes like you + replies on autopilot
171 followers
Your AI inbox that writes like you + replies on autopilot
171 followers
AI Emaily is the AI-native inbox that runs like your chief of staff. It reads every message, triages what actually needs you, and quiets the noise. It drafts replies in your own voice — not generic AI text — then schedules and sends across Gmail, Outlook, and any provider from one inbox. Three modes: Manual, Copilot, Autopilot. You approve, it acts, with undo and a full audit trail on everything. Your mail is never used to train models. Start free.













AI Emaily
Superhuman and Shortwave both pitch AI triage too. What's the one things here that actually makes someone switch over instead of just adding another inbox app?
AI Emaily
@dylan_hayes2 Good challenge. Triage is table stakes — the switch is that AI Emaily actually acts: Autopilot sends inside your boundaries with undo + full audit, Copilot drafts in your voice via the Context brain, it's truly universal (any provider, not just Gmail), team-ready (shared mailboxes, assign, comment), and private by design. Superhuman/Shortwave stop at suggestions and single-provider. Side-by-side here → aiemaily.com/compare
and you can check our use cases from here: aiemaily.com/use-cases
Tried a couple of "writes like you" tools before and they were fine for short replies but fell apart on anything with real negotiation or nuance. Where does this one land on that?
AI Emaily
@cody_spencer That's exactly where most "writes like you" tools break — they're guessing. AI Emaily doesn't guess: nuance comes from the Context brain you set. For a real negotiation you give it the specifics — the client profile, contracts, project progress, guardrails, and your tone — so the draft has actual context behind it, not just style. And on the hard ones you stay in the loop: Copilot drafts and waits for your approval, with undo + full audit if you let Autopilot run. It holds up precisely where the generic tools fall apart. More → aiemaily.com/use-cases
Looks really promising. I like the focus on drafting emails in your own writing style instead of generic AI responses, and having manual, copilot, and autopilot modes gives users a lot of flexibility. Congrats on your launch!!! How long does it typically take for AI Emaily to learn and reliably match a user's writing style?
AI Emaily
@aren_barseghyan Thank you, Aren — really appreciate that, and you nailed the two things we care most about 🙌 On timing: there's basically no "learning" wait. You set your voice up front in the Context brain (your details, how you like to sound, optional client profiles), so it matches your style reliably from the very first draft rather than needing days of data.
From there each edit just sharpens it. And yeah — Manual → Copilot → Autopilot means you decide exactly how much it handles, day by day. Congrats-energy right back at you for taking the time to dig in!
Check our use cases for different features → aiemaily.com/use-cases
The covenience of full autopilot is obvious, but there's a real trade-off between speed and the one bad send that damages a relationship. Where's the line you'd draw between Capilot and letting it run alone?
AI Emaily
@jack_sullivan5 Exactly the right question — and honestly the one we designed the whole product around. Our take on the line: let Autopilot run where a send is low-stakes and reversible; keep Copilot where the relationship or judgment is on the line.
In practice that means Autopilot handles the routine, rule-scoped lanes — scheduling confirmations, receipts, "got it, will do," routing/labeling — inside boundaries you set. Anything sensitive (a client negotiation, a first outreach, a tricky thread) stays in Copilot: drafted in your voice, waiting for your click.
And even on Autopilot it's not a blind trust fall — an action allowlist limits what it can do, there's an optional send delay, every action is logged with a full audit trail, and undo has your back. So the "one bad send" risk is bounded by your rules, not the model's confidence. Start narrow, widen the lanes as trust builds.
Check our use cases for different features → aiemaily.com/use-cases
Does it actually learn your voice over time or do you have to feed it past sent emails upfront to get that personalized tone right from day one?
AI Emaily
@cemilorgu You steer the voice through Personal Context — a folder of tone notes, facts, and snippets you write once. It's dialed in from day one, then gets sharper every time you edit or approve a draft. You stay in full control of what it knows and how it sounds.
How does the voice-matching actually work in practice, does it learn from past sent mail or do I have to feed it samples upfront?
AI Emaily
@mervetc6u You shape the voice directly through Personal Context — your own folder of tone preferences, notes, and facts. Keep it global, or scope it to a specific client or contact profile. When you reply to a client, AI Emaily pulls their profile plus the context you've assigned them and drafts in the right tone with the right details. Every edit you make refines it — so it sounds like you and knows what it's talking about.