AI Detector by CaS

Name: AI Detector by CaS
Rating: 3.14 (7 reviews)

Detect with Confidence : Your Ultimate AI Detector (FREE)

3.1•7 reviews•

710 followers

Detect with Confidence : Your Ultimate AI Detector (FREE)

3.1•7 reviews•

710 followers

Visit website

AI Metrics and Evaluation

•

AI Content Detection

Introducing the best-in-class AI Detector by C@S that checks Chat GPT, GPT-3, and other AI models. Our tool offers more than just AI checking, providing a complete evaluation for your peace of mind. The important thing to remember is its checking how robotic sounding the content is. So if nothing else, it will highlight areas that need to be improved in that area and ultimately help human writers be more "human". :) Try it now for free!

AI Detector by Content at Scale gallery image

Free

Launch tags:Marketing•SEO•Artificial Intelligence

Launch Team

TinyFishSearch, fetch and browse for AI agents. Claim 30% bonus!

Promoted

Can you point me to someplace on your website that speaks about the end goal of the AI content checker (ethical purposes, catching misinformation, etc.)? How does this align with your AI content bypass services? I'm speaking about the dichotomy of services you are offering.

Report

3yr ago

I've been using Content at Scale now for a couple of my own projects, with an eye toward how I could use it to create content for my clients, too. You know... be the guinea pig! I've tried several different AI content writers, including whichever one you're thinking about right now. They vary in quality - a lot. Many of them are very hard to work with, where you're essentially spoon-feeding it a few words and hoping to get a couple of sentences at a time. Some are easier to use but the output is just... off. Wooden and bland - that's probably the best description. So, when ChatGPT came out, I was pretty excited. Sure, it couldn't really do SEO writing, but at least it sounded way more human than the other tools. IF you could get on, right? But just when I was getting excited about its possibilities, then I heard about AI detectors. Having been in the content business since 2005, I've seen a lot of strategies, companies, and even industries come and go (and when they go, they tank!). The idea of building on sand stinks. A friend told me about Content at Scale - and that it's excellent for SEO AND that it's not detectable as AI. I had to try it out. I bought the smallest package possible (maybe 5 articles?). The content came back really solid - about 90% of the way there for publishing. (Pro tip: ALWAYS invest just a little more time to optimize the output and add that human touch.) Now I'm building out a content site that I plan to monetize. While some of my written content will be based on the podcast interviews I'm doing with subject matter experts, all of the other posts will be drafted by Content at Scale. I'd originally thought it would take me 3-4 months to get to just 20 articles posted, I'm currently publishing 3 per week. It's easy. It's fun. And I know going all-in on publishing works. Because this project is progressing quickly, it's easy to stay focused on it, too. TL;DR Content at Scale is excellent and well worth the price.

Report

3yr ago

Do you require a higher credit score? Do you intend to raise your grade in school? Do you want to spy on a cheating partner? What'sapp, Facebook, Instagram, Facebook, or another social network? Do you require any database-related information? Do you require the recovery of deleted files? Are there any DMV or criminal records that need to be cleared? Do you want to delete any blogs or links to any websites? Do you want to recover lost, stolen or disabled social media? Then you should get in touch with this hacker Adrian Lamo at (hackwithadrianlamo @ gmail .com) because he is trustworthy and skilled.

Report

3yr ago

I've been testing various AI content detection tools and still don't understand their purpose. They are not grounded in any universal standards. They all make similar claims, but what are you really getting for your money? Indeed, there's such a sweeping difference in their scoring of given texts it's ridiculous. For example, take the following AI-produced text: An AI produced text by Type.ai: "Let's take a moment to consider the role of AI in photographic processing. As we all know, photography is a form of art that requires great skill and attention to detail. However, with the advent of AI technology, we have seen an increase in the use of automated processes for tasks like image enhancement and color correction. While some may argue that this takes away from the artistic integrity of photography, others believe that it allows for greater efficiency and consistency in output. At its core, AI in photographic processing is about finding a balance between these two approaches. With careful consideration and thoughtful implementation, it's possible to leverage the benefits of AI while still maintaining the unique qualities that make photography such a special and valuable art form." Content at Scale = 58% human Copyleaks = 99.9% AI Percent Human = 0% human GPTZero = Your text is likely to be written entirely by AI AICheatCheck = 100% certain the text was written by an AI Hive Moderation = 99.9% AI --- Changed with Hyperwrite’s “Writing Improver” tool and a rephrase recommeded by Grammarly. "Let us pause for a moment to contemplate artificial intelligence's role in photographic processing. Undoubtedly, photography constitutes an art form necessitating exceptional skill and meticulous attention to nuance. However, the advent of AI technology has ushered in a surge of automated methods for tasks such as image enhancement and color correction. While some may contend that this erodes the artistic integrity of photography, others maintain that it facilitates heightened efficiency and consistency in the final product. At its essence, AI in photographic processing seeks to strike a delicate equilibrium between these divergent perspectives. Through judicious evaluation and astute implementation, it is plausible to harness AI's advantages while preserving the distinctive qualities that render photography a profoundly cherished and invaluable art form." Content at Scale = 100% human Copyleaks = 20% human Percent Human = 100% human GPTZero = Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human AICheatCheck = 76% certain the text was generated by a Human Hive Moderation = 0% AI --- Now, this example may not prove anything, but it says something: it demonstrates that these AI detection tools are a waste of money and time because there are no standards by which to judge. It also shows that beating these detectors is pretty simple by rewriting text to provide one that passes the tools purported to help spot them.

Report

3yr ago

MYND

Maker

Hello Product Hunt community, As the maker of AI Detector by Content at Scale, I am thrilled to share our innovative tool with you. We're excited to bring AI Detector by Content at Scale to Product Hunt. Our tool uses advanced algorithms to detect ChatGPT, GPT-3 and many other AI-generated content, making it easier to distinguish between human and robot-written text. With billions of pages of data as our training ground, we've developed an accurate AI detector that predicts the most probable word choices leading to higher AI detection probability. Whether you're a marketer, publisher, or educational resource entity, our tool can help you produce high-quality, reliable report with just one click. Thank you for considering our product. I'm here to answer any questions you may have, so please don't hesitate to reach out. Let's push the boundaries of AI detection technology together!

Report

3yr ago

The Content at Scale AI Detector is an incredibly valuable tool for bloggers looking to ensure their content is of the highest quality. I recently used the tool and found it to be highly accurate and easy-to-use. I tested a blog post that I had written about the latest news in Generative AI and found that Content at Scale AI Detector correctly identified it as being humanly-optimized. This gave me added confidence that even though I had used generative AI tools, my editing skills mean that my blog post was relevant and well-written, and not flagged as AI generated. The AI content checker is trained on billions of individual pages of data and words which can identify nuances in language that even experienced writers may overlook. This makes it an invaluable resource for bloggers who want to publish unique, high-quality content with confidence. @jus10mcgill you get my upvote!🔺

Report

3yr ago

AI Detector by CaS

Maker

@amanda_weston LOVE this example. Thanks for sharing how you used it. It's the exact use case we built it for. :)

Report

3yr ago

This tool is just what I needed. I am so glad Julia introduced to me C@S. The timing was perfect and I know this will help me reach my writing goals for 2023!

Report

3yr ago

AI Detector by CaS

Maker

@jalcorn So glad to have you :)

Report

3yr ago

1 2 3 4

•••

3.1

Based on 7 reviews

Review AI Detector by CaS?

AI Detector by CaS receives mixed reviews. Users appreciate its thoroughness and visual cues, finding it helpful for identifying robotic-sounding content. Some praise its accuracy and utility for writers. However, others criticize the new version for inaccurate detection percentages and lack of features from previous versions. Issues with subscription cancellation and customer support were noted but later resolved. Overall, while some users find it promising and useful, others are disappointed with recent updates, suggesting room for improvement in functionality and user experience.

Summarized with AI

Pros

Cons

Reviews

Most Informative