Reviewers describe Tana as a powerful, highly flexible note and knowledge tool that matches complex, non-linear ways of thinking. The most praised features are supertags, live searches, meeting transcription, voice capture, and AI that helps summarize, organize, and resurface information without heavy manual setup. Many say it works especially well for tasks, projects, research, and meeting-heavy workflows. The tradeoff is clear: Tana has a real learning curve, and users repeatedly want better mobile apps, stronger integrations and API access, smoother collaboration, and a few quality-of-life improvements.
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Inbox AI
Inbox AI
Tana
Inbox AI
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
Tana
@Tana @orenlevitin truly inspiring
@tarjeiv @hilde_dybdahl_johannessen just one critical request — please improve sharing feature.
I want to share my thought frameworks with friends and investors, but the current process is too cumbersome:
• Download HTML
• Upload to Framer
• Polish styles
It’s not that long, but I can’t keep doing it after every update. On the other hand it would be easy for you. The current public pages are awful—they don’t reflect the hierarchy of the structure I’m creating, which undermines the whole idea of Tana.
This is a critical point that stops me from aggressive promoting of Tana😅
Tana
Tana
Taskade AI Mobile: Supercharge Workflows
supertags are one of the most interesting ideas in the note-taking space. the idea that your notes arent just text but typed objects with properties changes what you can do with them downstream.
the question every structured-note tool faces is: how much structure is too much? Roam went heavy on backlinks. Notion went heavy on databases. Tana is betting on types and properties.
curious how the AI integration handles the structured data. if agents can reason over typed objects (not just search text), thats a fundamentally different capability than what most note tools offer.