opencode

Your terminal's AI agent, with any model you want

5.0•37 reviews•

947 followers

Your terminal's AI agent, with any model you want

5.0•37 reviews•

947 followers

•

•

opencode is an open-source AI coding agent built for the terminal. It features a native TUI, multi-session support, and is model-agnostic, letting you use Claude, OpenAI, Google, or even local models.

Framer AI AgentsDesign and publish professional sites with AI

Promoted

opencode Launches

opencode zenAI models recommended for developers by the opencode team

Launched on September 29th, 2025

opencodeYour terminal's AI agent, with any model you want

Launched on July 11th, 2025

5.0

Based on 37 reviews

Review opencode?

Reviewers describe opencode as a fast, clean terminal coding tool that stays simple while letting people switch between free, local, and third-party models. Users repeatedly praise its responsive TUI, low-friction setup, and editor integrations, saying it feels helpful without getting in the way. The main user complaint is that configuration can be a bit awkward. Makers of Edgee, Polygraph, and Vokal also highlight its compatibility with existing developer workflows, context optimization, and strong local runtime.

+34

Summarized with AI

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Athena

•1 review

What's great

Model-agnostic design is a strong differentiator, being able to swap between Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, or local models without lock-in is genuinely useful
Native TUI feels right for a terminal tool; it respects the environment it lives in rather than fighting it
Multi-session support is a practical win for developers juggling multiple contexts
Open-source means the community can audit, extend, and self-host it

What needs improvement

The tool is still relatively new, so context window management and large codebase

navigation likely need more polish

No mention of agentic loop controls (e.g., approval modes, auto-apply guardrails) trust and safety mechanisms matter a lot for an agent that writes code
Terminal-first UX limits accessibility; there's no IDE extension path mentioned, which narrows the audience
"Model-agnostic" is only as strong as the abstraction layer, if switching models silently degrades quality (e.g., tool-use inconsistencies), users may not notice until it's a problem

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

180 views4mo ago

•1 review

What's great

cost-effective (1)good context management (1)good ui (1)

It's a good tool for AI coding. I like that it's not too complicated and that it offers free models, while also allowing users to integrate models from other providers.

What needs improvement

configuration complexity (1)

Configuration is a bit cumbersome with jsonc files, but it's not too bad.

vs Alternatives

Codex by OpenAI

Claude Code

The system prompt does not contain any major distortions and is not intended to alter the models' identities or capabilities.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

17 views8d ago

•1 review

I’ve just tried out opencodes zen recently, it’s one of the simplest and fastest setups I’ve come across in a while, for working with LLMs in the terminal. The "TUI" feels super clean and intuitive, no fussing around, just install, configure and start using it. (waiting for its support on the Bun runtime though)

Report

190 views11mo ago

Athena

•1 review

What's great

Model-agnostic design is a strong differentiator, being able to swap between Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, or local models without lock-in is genuinely useful
Native TUI feels right for a terminal tool; it respects the environment it lives in rather than fighting it
Multi-session support is a practical win for developers juggling multiple contexts
Open-source means the community can audit, extend, and self-host it

What needs improvement

The tool is still relatively new, so context window management and large codebase

navigation likely need more polish

No mention of agentic loop controls (e.g., approval modes, auto-apply guardrails) trust and safety mechanisms matter a lot for an agent that writes code
Terminal-first UX limits accessibility; there's no IDE extension path mentioned, which narrows the audience
"Model-agnostic" is only as strong as the abstraction layer, if switching models silently degrades quality (e.g., tool-use inconsistencies), users may not notice until it's a problem

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

180 views4mo ago

•1 review

What's great

cost-effective (1)good context management (1)good ui (1)

It's a good tool for AI coding. I like that it's not too complicated and that it offers free models, while also allowing users to integrate models from other providers.

What needs improvement

configuration complexity (1)

Configuration is a bit cumbersome with jsonc files, but it's not too bad.

vs Alternatives

Codex by OpenAI

Claude Code

The system prompt does not contain any major distortions and is not intended to alter the models' identities or capabilities.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

17 views8d ago

•1 review

Report

190 views11mo ago