Launching today
Connect Google Search Console, Google Analytics, import your Ahrefs or Semrush lists, and crawl your site on 200-point technical SEO Audit. CrawlRaven joins all four and hands back a ranked plan: what to write, what to update, what to fix first.
CrawlRaven
CrawlRaven
@ayushtweetshere Thanks Ayush!
Been in SEO space for 10 years now.
My workflow moved between duplicating and changing filters across tab, joining multiple Sheets just to get the right insights. I have longed for something like this. The existing tools never changed my workflow, but this one did.
Super excited to share it with the amazing guys at Product Hunt!
Looking forward to your feedback and support
@ayushtweetshere Hey, pulling GSC and GA4 into one place is the boring problem nobody wants to solve. When I've worked with SEO agencies the crawl reports were always 200 issues long with no sense of which five actually moved traffic. Does CrawlRaven rank findings by likely impact, or is prioritizing still on me?
CrawlRaven
@artem_fedorovich Yeah, the "200 issues, no idea which five matter" report is exactly what we were sick of. Every finding gets an impact score from 0 to 100, and your list sorts by it, so the top of the page is the handful worth doing this week. The score comes from your own numbers: how much real search demand a term has and how close you already are to winning it.
Note: Search Console is live today, GA4 and the crawl audit are coming next.
CrawlRaven
@tehreem_fatima5 Daily. CrawlRaven pulls fresh Search Console data every day for every site, and the decay and cannibalization detectors re-run on each sync. So a page that starts slipping shows up in your list within a day or two of the trend appearing, not weeks later when it's already fallen off page 1.
Raakesh, the ranking by impressions and closeness to page 1 is the part that caught me, because it also shows where a model like this can struggle.
I run SEO for a niche B2B product in healthcare. My highest-intent terms show zero or missing volume in every tool and barely register in Search Console, since only a few hundred people a month search them at all, yet those are the ones that convert. A prioritizer built on demand would push them straight to the bottom.
Can I weight a keyword up by hand, or mark a low-volume term as high-value, so the ranked plan does not bury the long tail a small market lives on?
CrawlRaven
@clemente_lopez1 I agree with your use case. I have similar experience. Highest intent terms often show very minimal data in GSC. We have plans to add controls for the user where they can decide how they want to prioritise. Consider this added to roadmap.
200-point technical audit is a specific number worth unpacking. Is that 200 distinct checks across categories like indexability, Core Web Vitals, structured data, internal linking, and so on, or is it more like a marketing number that counts variations of similar checks? Screaming Frog and Sitebulb also run extensive technical audits, curious what CrawlRaven's crawl catches that those tools typically miss or under-weight.
CrawlRaven
@ansari_adinThe crawl is what we're building next, so I won't pretend a 200-check spec sheet exists today. That number comes from our v1, which was a full technical SEO crawler before we rebuilt around Search Console data.
I'm not trying to beat Screaming Frog or Sitebulb on check count. We're building the part they leave to you: ranking each finding by whether it hits a page that actually gets traffic and sits close to a win. A broken canonical on a dead page and one on your top traffic page look the same in most crawlers. We tell you which to fix first, using your GSC data.
So what we catch that they miss is the impact ranking. Happy to send you the real breakdown once it ships.
MonoCloud for Startups
Congrats on the launch! The cannibalization detection caught my eye. I'd pay for that alone if it works well, because everyone knows two of your own pages end up competing for the same keyword, and nobody checks it regularly since it means exporting everything and cross-referencing by hand.
One question, what happens when the keyword list itself is stale? Does the tool flag keywords that stopped mattering, or does it take the list as given?
Upvoted, will try it on our site this week.
CrawlRaven
@roguetink You will be able to see ranks, positions and pages for any given keyword. It recommend how to target keywords and in what priority
CrawlRaven
@roguetink Thanks. Cannibalization was one of the original itches, my cofounder's agency was doing exactly that export-and-cross-reference routine you describe.
On stale keywords, the list isn't taken as given. Every keyword is matched against your live Search Console data, which refreshes daily, so one that stopped mattering shows its real current numbers. And you can mark any keyword as ignored, it drops out of your working list without being deleted, so the list stays clean.
An automatic "this keyword is dead" flag isn't there yet, but it's a really good idea. Would love to hear what it finds on your site this week.
Cool idea, agentic AI is definitely the future of SEO work. The whole product hinges on the ranking model. Is "ranked by ranking impact" a fixed weighting, or does it actually learn from what moved rankings on my specific site (or other sites.)
CrawlRaven
@aidan_codefox The ranking uses fixed rules, no AI. It looks at three things from your own Search Console data. How much search demand a keyword has, how close you are to page 1, and how many clicks you should be getting but aren't. Since it runs on your data, your list is yours alone.
Tell me how you'd want it though. Would you rather set the rules yourself, or have it watch what you changed and whether your rankings went up?
Congrats on the launch! Using real GSC impressions and position gaps to surface quick wins is super smart. How far down in rankings (e.g., positions 11–20 vs. 20+) does the algorithm look to identify those high-potential pages?
CrawlRaven
@hannesh Thanks. It looks at positions 4 through 20, so the bottom of page 1 and the top of page 2 both count. The closer you already rank, the higher it lands on your list, since a jump from 6 to 2 wins more clicks than a climb from 18. We skip anything past 20, since those need real content work. And we want at least 50 impressions so the term is one people actually search.
Where would you draw the line? Some folks want to reach past 20 for niche terms that still convert. Others want the list tight around fast wins. Which fits how you work?
CrawlRaven
@hannesh Exactly right, and the impression threshold is what makes it work. Positions 20 to 30 get noisy, so you'd want a demand floor before surfacing them, or it's just a longer list. Filed as a power-user filter. Thanks for thinking it through with us. Maybe we can try min max filters for it.