I turned my solo software studio site into a public trail from product decisions to useful work
I built iisacc around a simple promise: practical software that raises human creativity and helps imagination become useful work.
Instead of making the site only a portfolio or a store, I connected four layers: the products, the human problems they are intended to solve, technical material, and the development decisions behind them. The current public work includes Vincent, local digital paper for visual thinking; WeUs, an AI-native social network in early access; LVRS documentation; and a free 77-page English eBook about shipping maintainable AI-assisted software.
I also expose unfinished commercial status rather than hiding it: Vincent sales are paused, WeUs is early access, and the advertising workspace is planning-only.
For other solo makers: does combining a studio, products, technical material, and a public decision record make the business easier to understand, or would you separate them into different sites?
Replies