I got tired of AI landing page graders telling me to "improve my value prop".

Hey Product Hunt!

You know how it goes: you vibe-code a SaaS landing page in Lovable or Cursor, it looks great, traffic starts coming in... and then nothing. Conversion sits at 0.5%.

You ask Claude what's wrong. It tells you to "clarify your value proposition" or "add social proof." Technically not wrong. Completely unhelpful when you need to ship a fix today.

That's why I built CRO co-pilot (working name). It's not another AI grader that spits out a 20-point PDF report nobody reads. It's built specifically for the vibe-coding workflow.

Here's what it actually does:

You paste your URL — no signup, no setup. It benchmarks your page against real competitors in your SaaS category (something raw LLMs physically can't do without a curated corpus). Every finding is tied to actual UX standards — Nielsen's heuristics, Laws of UX, WCAG thresholds — not a model guessing best practices. It's built on human expert methodology, not AI improvisation.

And here's the part that matters: instead of a generic checklist, you get a ready-to-paste .md brief. You drop it directly into Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, or v0, and your coding agent applies the fix to your actual codebase.

One thing I want to be upfront about: we won't promise a guaranteed conversion lift. Anyone who does is lying. A recent CrazyEgg test actually showed that blindly following the "best" AI grader dropped conversions by 16.4%. Instead of false confidence, we show you exactly which niche pattern or UX principle each finding is based on, so you know the reasoning behind every recommendation.

If you have a live page with traffic but low conversion, try it out and let me know if the .md output actually saves you time compared to manual tweaking. Brutal feedback welcome.