How do you prove workflow training changed real behavior?
Most workflow training ends with a completion check. That does not tell an ops lead whether someone can repeat a fragile browser task safely.
We built Rehearse around a different loop:
1. Record a real workflow.
2. Turn the recording into step-by-step practice.
3. Let learners rehearse locally without touching production.
4. Compare baseline and final results.
The current version deliberately keeps learner evidence on-device and uses a manual result-return handoff. That is privacy-friendly, but we suspect the handoff may be the first thing that breaks at team scale.
For people who run onboarding, SOPs, or compliance training: what is the smallest proof you would trust before letting someone touch the live system? And would a manual result return be acceptable for a 10-50 person pilot, or must it be automated from day one?
Rehearse launches here tomorrow. I’m looking for honest operator feedback, especially on that tradeoff.

Replies
Be the first to reply
Have a question or a thought to share? Add a comment above to start the conversation.