Why RCF > other code protections: Obfuscation gets broken by AI. Watermarking is too late. Licenses get ignored. RCF: Visible for humans + technical barriers + legal line "Visibility Usage Rights". This powers Aurora Access dOS. GitHub: https://github.com/AuroraAccess cc @balajis @VitalikButerin #PostQuantum #DigitalSovereignty

Problem: IP theft & unauthorized code kill decentralized hardware. How to guarantee your dOS node, security key or IoT runs exactly what it should even against quantum attacks?Solution: RCF Firmware Aurora A-VM safe sandbox for signed .acode modules
Dilithium2 PQC signatures (protected today)
RCF Hardware Protocol v1.2.9 (SDIO/SPI/UART via secure opcodes)
RCF Bunker zero-leakage crypto enclave Enforces RCF-PL v1.2.8 at hardware level.Docs: rcf.aliyev.site/firmware
GitHub: github.com/aliyevaladddin/rcf-firmwareWhat do you think about hardware-level license enforcement + PQC in embedded?

#CyberSecurity #PQC #Firmware #RCF

As developers, we ve always lived by the mantra of "Open Source." But in 2026, the landscape has shifted. We're no longer just sharing code with other humans; we're providing high-quality training data for AI models and automated extraction scripts.

Standard licenses like MIT or GPL were built for a different era. They don't distinguish between a human reading your code to learn and an AI "digesting" your unique correlation methodologies to replicate them at scale.

That s why I built RCF (Restricted Correlation Framework).

---

Protecting Intellectual Property in the Age of AI: Announcing RCF Protocol v1.2.7

Traditional Open Source licenses were built for a world where humans read code. Today, AI models ingest it, and automated scrapers replicate proprietary logic in milliseconds.

We are excited to share the release of Restricted Correlation Framework (RCF) v1.2.7 a specialized licensing protocol designed to bridge the gap between Transparency and Asset Protection.

The Core Principle: Visibility Rights

Launching RCF Protocol today. Before you upvote, some honest questions for the community:

The tension I couldn't resolve:

RCF markers ([RCF:PUBLIC] [RCF:RESTRICTED]) are designed for compliant systems to respect. But non-compliant scrapers will ignore them. Is a "polite request" protocol valuable, or does it just create false security?

What surprised me while building: