Pulse
Your company's permission-aware, proactive and agentic brain
Start new thread

Pulse - Your company's permission-aware, proactive and agentic brain

by•
Most AI tools start each session blank and answer with no way to check them. Pulse is your company's brain. It connects Slack, email, docs, meetings, and 25 tools into one permission-aware memory, then answers anything with a citation on every line. Decisions get captured once and never re-explained. It finds the right expert, runs agents you approve, builds reports from real data, and works by voice. And it lives inside Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT over MCP.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌
Hey PH, Apoorv here, solo builder of Pulse. I built this because every AI tool I used at work had the same flaw: it didn't actually know my company. Every session started from zero. Every answer sounded confident and gave me nothing to verify. And most "company knowledge" tools quietly turned into surveillance. Pulse is three bets: - Decisions, commitments, and lessons are first-class things, not strings buried in a Slack thread. They get captured, linked to who decided and why, and they outlive the people who made them. - Retrieval mirrors your existing permissions. Pulse only ever shows someone what they already have access to in the source, so it stays permission-aware by construction. - Every answer carries a citation on every line. If Pulse can't back a claim with a source, it says so instead of guessing. It also lives inside Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT over MCP, so the AI tools you already use finally start the session knowing your company. Under the hood, it's a full platform: a proactive Home, cited Ask with deep research, a decision graph, expert finder, agents with human approval, real-data outputs, and voice control over all of it. I'd love your honest take, especially on the permission model and where it'd break for your team. Ask me anything. Free Demo:
🔌 Plugged in

 Amazing launch , Checking it soon

Maker

 Thank you, means a lot.

decisions that outlive who made them is the real bet. when one gets reversed, does the old call retire, or stay cited so you see the shift?

Maker

 

Love this question, because "decisions that outlive who made them" is close to word-for-word why I built this.

The old call never retires. Every decision stays in the archive permanently with its evidence trail, who made it, and links back to the original threads. When a new decision contradicts an old one, Pulse detects the contradiction (a nightly job scans for exactly this), and if you ask about the topic it shows both views, marks which one is current, and explains how it decided: recency, authority, and specificity, in that order. So you see the shift, not just the latest answer.

The reversal itself becomes useful history too. Each decision carries an outcome-check date, and when it arrives Pulse re-evaluates the call against what actually happened and surfaces "this aged badly" so the lesson lands. And when someone drafts a similar decision later, the devil's advocate feature argues against it citing your own past reversals.

Retiring old calls silently would throw away the most expensive thing a team produces: the record of what it used to believe and why it changed. Pulse keeps the whole arc.

OpenAI
OpenAI Day
What could you build with GPT-5.6 that wasn’t practical before?
Maker
I built the permission-aware layer for my product, which was the most significant and important part of it.