We're not building a better Wispr Flow

I get this comparison constantly. 'Isn't this just Wispr Flow with more features?'

No. Here's the actual difference.

Wispr Flow takes your voice and produces clean text. Then you still do the work — compose the email, hit send, open the converter, drag the file. Wispr Flow is fast at one step. The rest is still on you.

Owlfy executes the whole thing.

Here's a real example:

I had 50 photos and 3 videos to process. Manual path: open a converter site, upload images one at a time, wait, download, repeat for the videos. About an hour.

Owlfy path: select the folder, say — 'Convert the photos to PNG and strip filler words from the videos.'

Same folder. Two minutes later. Zero app switches. Zero browser uploads.

The actual difference:

  Wispr Flow / Typeless:  Your voice → clean text → you do the rest

  Owlfy:  Your voice → the finished outcome, delivered to you

⚠  Honest truth: voice isn't the right input for every situation. Open-plan office, on a call, in a meeting — you'll type. Owlfy handles both. But it's built for the moments when you can speak and want the outcome, not the transcript.

💬  What task would you want voice-to-action for first — email, files, or something else?