Laxis - Make meeting notes awesome, type 4x faster, translate live
by•
Note-takers can't dictate. Dictation apps can't run your meetings. Laxis does both — record and summarize meetings bot-free, then dictate emails and notes faster than you type. Live transcription and translation in 100+ languages. Trusted by 100,000+ professionals.
Replies
Laxis
Really like how Laxis goes beyond simple transcription. The combination of AI note-taking and voice dictation feels like a real productivity boost, especially for people who spend hours in meetings or constantly switching between writing and speaking.
Laxis
@1mirul You nailed it, Amirul — that constant switch between speaking and writing is exactly where the time leaks, and closing that gap is the whole point. Really appreciate the support!
@sxiao Thanks! That's exactly what caught my attention—the seamless flow from speaking to structured notes feels much more natural than juggling multiple apps. Excited to see how Laxis continues to evolve. Wishing you and the team an amazing launch! 🚀
Me believung the combination of transcription translation and dictation makes this more than a simple meeting tool. The feature set covers several dailt tasks. Case studies showing measurable time savings would make the overall value even easier to understand.
Laxis
@advin_jadis Exactly the vision, Advin — one tool for the whole conversation, not just the meeting. Great call on the case studies too; we're compiling real time-savings stories right now (users tell us it saves them hours a week). Thanks for the thoughtful note!
to be honest, love the part of no bot joining the call the most. it was always very weird for me with other note takers. good product!
Laxis
@lina_dikhtiaruk That's exactly why we built it, Lina — recording a call shouldn't mean a random bot shows up in the participant list. So glad it clicked for you 🙏
The workflow feels intuitive. I can easily see this becoming part of my daily meeting routine.
Laxis
@monir_ Thanks for the kind words!
The auto-share default flagged in your reviews is the thing I would fix before anything else on the roadmap.
A summary that lands in every attendee's inbox changes what gets said in the room. People already talk differently once a recorder is running. If they also know their words get summarised and distributed automatically, you get a more careful and less useful meeting, and you never see the cost, because the thing you lost was never captured in the first place.
On sales calls it is sharper than that. My internal read on a call is not something I want auto-delivered to the prospect with a confident summary voice attached to it.
Separate thought on the positioning. Note-takers cannot dictate, dictation apps cannot run meetings, so you do both. I spent a year selling a catalogue and the lesson that cost me most was that buyers do not buy the union of two things, they buy the one they already came for.
Which of the two is the reason people actually stay? From the reviews it reads like the SDR side, which would be a third answer again.
Laxis
@rabnoor_s Thanks, Rabnoor — sharp feedback.
On auto-share: you're pointing at the right risk, and it's already in the host's hands — whether a summary auto-shares is a setting you control, not something we force.
On the positioning point, really appreciate the feedback too.
@sxiao Fair, and a setting is the right answer for the host.
The part I would still watch is that the person carrying the risk is not the host. It is the other four people on the call, who never saw the setting and have no idea which way it was left.
Defaults do the real work here. Whatever it ships defaulted to becomes what almost everyone runs, and the people affected by that choice are never the ones who made it.
Not saying make it harder. Saying make it visible in the room, so nobody has to trust a setting they cannot see.
Good luck with the rest of the day.