Laxis
The AI platform for every conversation
Start new thread

Laxis - Make meeting notes awesome, type 4x faster, translate live

by
•
Note-takers can't dictate. Dictation apps can't run your meetings. Laxis does both — record and summarize meetings bot-free, then dictate emails and notes faster than you type. Live transcription and translation in 100+ languages. Trusted by 100,000+ professionals.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌
Hey Everyone👋 Some of you have seen Laxis here before — which is exactly why this launch matters to us. We're not a new product; we're a much better one. Over the past year we spent more time listening than shipping, and it changed everything. Your feedback pushed us to rebuild Laxis around two jobs you kept asking us to nail: 🎙️ A meeting assistant that respects your calls. Laxis records, transcribes, and summarizes every meeting — with no bot ever joining. You get personalized summaries, automatic action items, 50+ report templates, and live translation across 100+ languages. ⌨️ An AI voice keyboard. Speak instead of type: Laxis turns your voice into clean, formatted text anywhere you write, up to 4x faster than typing — punctuation and filler words handled for you. A note-taker that can't dictate and a dictation app that can't run meetings used to be two separate tools (and two subscriptions). Now they're one. We won't be shy about it: we believe Laxis is now the most complete and powerful AI meeting + voice app you can get. But we'd rather you be the judge. We'll be here all day — tell us what you love, what's missing, and what we should build next. Every reply shapes the roadmap. 🙏 — Eric, Founder & CEO, Laxis

to be honest, love the part of no bot joining the call the most. it was always very weird for me with other note takers. good product!

Maker

 That's exactly why we built it, Lina — recording a call shouldn't mean a random bot shows up in the participant list. So glad it clicked for you 🙏

The auto-share default flagged in your reviews is the thing I would fix before anything else on the roadmap.

A summary that lands in every attendee's inbox changes what gets said in the room. People already talk differently once a recorder is running. If they also know their words get summarised and distributed automatically, you get a more careful and less useful meeting, and you never see the cost, because the thing you lost was never captured in the first place.

On sales calls it is sharper than that. My internal read on a call is not something I want auto-delivered to the prospect with a confident summary voice attached to it.

Separate thought on the positioning. Note-takers cannot dictate, dictation apps cannot run meetings, so you do both. I spent a year selling a catalogue and the lesson that cost me most was that buyers do not buy the union of two things, they buy the one they already came for.

Which of the two is the reason people actually stay? From the reviews it reads like the SDR side, which would be a third answer again.

Maker

 Thanks, Rabnoor — sharp feedback.

On auto-share: you're pointing at the right risk, and it's already in the host's hands — whether a summary auto-shares is a setting you control, not something we force.

On the positioning point, really appreciate the feedback too.

 Fair, and a setting is the right answer for the host.

The part I would still watch is that the person carrying the risk is not the host. It is the other four people on the call, who never saw the setting and have no idea which way it was left.

Defaults do the real work here. Whatever it ships defaulted to becomes what almost everyone runs, and the people affected by that choice are never the ones who made it.

Not saying make it harder. Saying make it visible in the room, so nobody has to trust a setting they cannot see.

Good luck with the rest of the day.