Hey PH — Maria here. I spent 10+ years in recruiting — placed a lot of people, managed a lot of recruiters, worked with hundreds of hiring managers. JAN is what came out of all of that. Most AI hiring tools are trying to sell a crystal ball that doesn't exist. You don't know if someone's a good hire until they're in the seat. No tool predicts that. Not mine, not anyone's. So I built JAN around what IS knowable: the facts as the candidate represents themselves on the page. JAN reads every resume for context — not buzzwords, not keyword density — against criteria YOU set. Evidence-backed A/B/C tiers, blind screening with EEOC guardrails built in for fairness, and 5–7 vetting questions tailored to each candidate. I'm not trying to replace anyone with AI. This is human-to-human. Get them on the phone. Ask the questions. Trust your instincts. That's where hiring decisions actually get made. JAN doesn't make the decision. It makes you superhuman at everything that gets you to it. Free to try.

JAN - JAN doesn't make hiring decisions. It makes you superhuman.

Replies